U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V [message #32226 is a reply to message #32190]

Mon, 02 May 2011 10:00

kohait00
Messages: 939
Registered: July 2009
Location: Germany

Experienced Contributor

ok thanks for clearing up this stuff.

doing Python exporting currently, i see Value as sort of object and try to align them. and in python too, they have bool, int, long (64) and real (double) (and a few more complex, and ofcorse 'complex' which is not available in Upp at all currently, maybe an idea for the future).
so dont be too eager to remove INT_V too soon, since it's there in most scripting languages.

BTW: Value with its type checks is ideally suited as a data type container, where Is<>() is kind of natural approach to be certain about a type, where type differences do really matter (i.e. communication layers). i'm really lazy to invent a new layer to cope with that Smile

so i use what upp gives already..

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: kohait00 on Wed, 13 April 2011 23:01
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: Mindtraveller on Fri, 15 April 2011 21:44
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: kohait00 on Sun, 17 April 2011 14:57
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: mirek on Sun, 17 April 2011 21:23
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: kohait00 on Mon, 18 April 2011 10:46
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: mirek on Tue, 19 April 2011 07:28
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: kohait00 on Wed, 27 April 2011 14:07
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: mirek on Fri, 29 April 2011 20:17
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: kohait00 on Mon, 02 May 2011 10:00
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: kohait00 on Tue, 03 May 2011 11:04
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: mirek on Fri, 06 May 2011 09:58
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: kohait00 on Mon, 09 May 2011 18:06
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: mirek on Fri, 13 May 2011 10:52
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: kohait00 on Tue, 17 May 2011 11:08
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: mirek on Tue, 17 May 2011 18:51
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: kohait00 on Wed, 18 May 2011 11:14
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: mirek on Wed, 18 May 2011 22:57
		Re: FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V By: kohait00 on Thu, 19 May 2011 09:35

Previous Topic:	Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect_<double>)
Next Topic:	Ptr improve

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Apr 30 03:55:28 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01259 seconds