|
|
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Ideas and priorities for the next development cycle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Ideas and priorities for the next development cycle [message #38433 is a reply to message #38190] |
Sat, 15 December 2012 16:50 |
nlneilson
Messages: 644 Registered: January 2010 Location: U.S. California. Mojave &...
|
Contributor |
|
|
The above post worked OK for basics. When a Find-Replace in addition to the Find was opened there were problems.
Instead comment these lines
C:\upp\uppsrc\CodeEditor\CodeEditor.cpp(261):
C:\upp\uppsrc\CodeEditor\FindReplace.cpp(252):
C:\upp\uppsrc\RichEdit\Cursor.cpp(94):
C:\upp\uppsrc\RichEdit\Cursor.cpp(328):
C:\upp\uppsrc\RichEdit\Cursor.cpp(347):
C:\upp\uppsrc\RichEdit\Find.cpp(113):
I have not run into any problems yet.
edit: If the find box was not always on top and didn't jump to the bottom center it would be better, at least for some.
[Updated on: Sat, 15 December 2012 17:07] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Ideas and priorities for the next development cycle [message #38435 is a reply to message #38433] |
Sat, 15 December 2012 17:23 |
Didier
Messages: 681 Registered: November 2008 Location: France
|
Contributor |
|
|
Hi all,
I have a very simple request/idea about the way you can use the help in theIde.
When editing some code, you can easily jump to the library source code, but when in the lib source all you can get is the help about a certain function OR edit the help for that lib (which is not what you want most of the time).
Idea:
When clicking on the 'blue square' a popup menu should appear. It would propose 2 options:
* edit the help
* view the help topic (and thus open the help viewer on the dedicated topic )
[Updated on: Sat, 15 December 2012 17:25] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Re: Ideas and priorities for the next development cycle [message #38470 is a reply to message #36984] |
Wed, 19 December 2012 15:47 |
lectus
Messages: 329 Registered: September 2006 Location: Brazil
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Android support is a must have, because it's the fastest growing mobile platform.
I believe with NDK you can use C++.
I think Mac OS X is also good to have, because it's part of the 3 big Desktop platforms: Windows, Linux and Mac OS X.
U++ is already full-featured as it is. It needs to concentrate on running on more platforms now (Skylark was a huge step in my opinion because web apps run everywhere if a browser is available).
[Updated on: Wed, 19 December 2012 15:52] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Jun 16 00:38:40 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01226 seconds
|
|
|