U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Community » Coffee corner » C++11

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: C++11 [message #38149 is a reply to message #38147]

Sun, 02 December 2012 20:12

dolik.rce is currently offline

dolik.rce
Messages: 1791
Registered: August 2008
Location: Czech Republic

Ultimate Contributor

dolik.rce@gmail.com

Lance wrote on Sun, 02 December 2012 19:30

If U++ will adopt rvalue references, will it create the possibility of getting rid of Vector and many other containers/algorithms? Mirek will know better. My feeling is that in many a situation, the answer probably is 'yes'. If that is true, moving code into and out of U++ could be greatly simplified.

Actually many of the containers are already compatibly with STL (search for STL_*_COMPATIBILITY in Core). So things wouldn't get much easier than they are now. Another thing is that there are not only differences in move semantics, but also in algorithms used, interfaces and possibly other, so there are still reasons to keep the U++ containers. Not even to mention that you have to think about backwards compatibility Wink

Wink

Honza

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		C++11 By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 12 October 2011 11:20
		Re: C++11 By: mirek on Fri, 14 October 2011 12:18
		Re: C++11 By: lectus on Sat, 03 December 2011 12:03
		Re: C++11 By: nlneilson on Sun, 02 December 2012 08:35
		Re: C++11 By: Lance on Sun, 02 December 2012 15:08
		Re: C++11 By: dolik.rce on Sun, 02 December 2012 16:04
		Re: C++11 By: Lance on Sun, 02 December 2012 18:05
		Re: C++11 By: Lance on Sun, 02 December 2012 18:47
		Re: C++11 By: Lance on Sun, 02 December 2012 19:30
		Re: C++11 By: dolik.rce on Sun, 02 December 2012 20:12
		Re: C++11 By: Lance on Sun, 02 December 2012 21:00
		Re: C++11 By: mirek on Mon, 03 December 2012 11:04
		Re: C++11 By: mirek on Mon, 03 December 2012 11:10
		Re: C++11 By: Lance on Tue, 04 December 2012 00:55
		Re: C++11 By: mirek on Tue, 04 December 2012 08:08
		Re: C++11 By: Lance on Tue, 19 March 2013 03:24
		Re: C++11 By: dolik.rce on Sun, 24 June 2012 09:51
		Re: C++11 By: mirek on Sun, 24 June 2012 12:50
		Re: C++11 By: unodgs on Sun, 24 June 2012 13:02
		Re: C++11 By: mirek on Sun, 24 June 2012 13:13
		Re: C++11 By: unodgs on Sun, 24 June 2012 13:21
		Re: C++11 By: dolik.rce on Sun, 24 June 2012 16:24
		Re: C++11 By: lectus on Wed, 27 June 2012 01:29
		Re: C++11 By: mirek on Thu, 28 June 2012 08:16
		Re: C++11 By: Lance on Sun, 02 December 2012 06:18

Previous Topic:	live session Prague 8.3.2013
Next Topic:	Have Visual Studio? Looking for prebuilt SDL 2.0

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Tue Apr 29 21:15:22 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00693 seconds