U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Community » Coffee corner » C++11

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: C++11 [message #38150 is a reply to message #38149]

Sun, 02 December 2012 21:00

Lance
Messages: 534
Registered: March 2007

Contributor

Hi Honza:

Thanks. I didn't know that.

It's probably better not to touch it at all, or add some additional interfaces to incorporate rvalue reference so that existing code doesn't break. But in that way copy construction/assignment still means pick_, and for deep copy, so that a class moving into U++ may have to revise its related constructors/= to behave correctly in U++.

A class not written with pick_ in mind will(or may?) not work correctly with Upp::Vector<>, even if it meets all the interface requirements superficially.

I agree benefit gain doesn't seem to justify the work involved and problems it may created.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		C++11 By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 12 October 2011 11:20
		Re: C++11 By: mirek on Fri, 14 October 2011 12:18
		Re: C++11 By: lectus on Sat, 03 December 2011 12:03
		Re: C++11 By: nlneilson on Sun, 02 December 2012 08:35
		Re: C++11 By: Lance on Sun, 02 December 2012 15:08
		Re: C++11 By: dolik.rce on Sun, 02 December 2012 16:04
		Re: C++11 By: Lance on Sun, 02 December 2012 18:05
		Re: C++11 By: Lance on Sun, 02 December 2012 18:47
		Re: C++11 By: Lance on Sun, 02 December 2012 19:30
		Re: C++11 By: dolik.rce on Sun, 02 December 2012 20:12
		Re: C++11 By: Lance on Sun, 02 December 2012 21:00
		Re: C++11 By: mirek on Mon, 03 December 2012 11:04
		Re: C++11 By: mirek on Mon, 03 December 2012 11:10
		Re: C++11 By: Lance on Tue, 04 December 2012 00:55
		Re: C++11 By: mirek on Tue, 04 December 2012 08:08
		Re: C++11 By: Lance on Tue, 19 March 2013 03:24
		Re: C++11 By: dolik.rce on Sun, 24 June 2012 09:51
		Re: C++11 By: mirek on Sun, 24 June 2012 12:50
		Re: C++11 By: unodgs on Sun, 24 June 2012 13:02
		Re: C++11 By: mirek on Sun, 24 June 2012 13:13
		Re: C++11 By: unodgs on Sun, 24 June 2012 13:21
		Re: C++11 By: dolik.rce on Sun, 24 June 2012 16:24
		Re: C++11 By: lectus on Wed, 27 June 2012 01:29
		Re: C++11 By: mirek on Thu, 28 June 2012 08:16
		Re: C++11 By: Lance on Sun, 02 December 2012 06:18

Previous Topic:	live session Prague 8.3.2013
Next Topic:	Have Visual Studio? Looking for prebuilt SDL 2.0

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Jun 13 02:22:51 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02290 seconds