U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » Gcc compile option proposal

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: Gcc compile option proposal [message #39104 is a reply to message #39103]

Fri, 15 February 2013 07:41

dolik.rce is currently offline

dolik.rce
Messages: 1791
Registered: August 2008
Location: Czech Republic

Ultimate Contributor

dolik.rce@gmail.com

mirek wrote on Thu, 14 February 2013 23:31

Hm, now I have checked and I am actually compiling with

-Wall -Wno-parentheses

so except that (&&) warning, which I consider really way too stupid, we are -Wall compliant.

OK, I could live with blacklisting the parentheses warnings. Other than that, my gcc 4.7.2 reports only one error in theide:

Quote:

/home/h/upp-production/uppsrc/ide/Help.cpp:581:10: warning: converting �false� to pointer type �IdeDesigner*� [-Wconversion-null]

With clang, it is bit worse:

$ umk uppsrc AllForI18n CLANG -ba | grep 'warning:' | sort -u | grep -o '\[-W.*\

' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn"
88 [-Wlogical-op-parentheses] *
40 [-Wdangling-else] *
16 [-Woverloaded-virtual]
3 [-Wunused-private-field]
1 [-Wbitwise-op-parentheses] *
1 [-Wbool-conversion] *
1 [-Winvalid-source-encoding] *
1 [-Wmismatched-tags] *
1 [-Wtautological-compare]
1 [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration]

Items marked with * are present by default, even without -Wall option. Numbers represents unique occurrences, the actual counts of the errors in output is even higher.

At least some of them should be fixed. I'll gladly volunteer Wink

Wink

Honza

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		Gcc compile option proposal By: Didier on Thu, 14 February 2013 19:33
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: mirek on Thu, 14 February 2013 20:08
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: dolik.rce on Thu, 14 February 2013 20:46
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: mirek on Thu, 14 February 2013 20:48
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: Didier on Thu, 14 February 2013 21:10
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: dolik.rce on Thu, 14 February 2013 21:52
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: mirek on Thu, 14 February 2013 23:01
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: mirek on Thu, 14 February 2013 23:21
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: mirek on Thu, 14 February 2013 23:31
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: dolik.rce on Fri, 15 February 2013 07:41
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: mirek on Fri, 15 February 2013 08:33
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: unodgs on Fri, 15 February 2013 11:11
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: Didier on Fri, 15 February 2013 17:50
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: nlneilson on Sat, 16 February 2013 17:29
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: mirek on Sat, 16 February 2013 18:28
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: mirek on Sat, 16 February 2013 11:16
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: dolik.rce on Sun, 17 February 2013 17:50
		Re: Gcc compile option proposal By: mirek on Fri, 15 February 2013 19:25

Previous Topic:	Request: completion 64 bit support in Draw and Stream
Next Topic:	Core/Rpc and VC 2012

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Mon Aug 04 07:14:51 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.07628 seconds