Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » Gcc compile option proposal
Re: Gcc compile option proposal [message #39106 is a reply to message #39105] |
Fri, 15 February 2013 11:11   |
|
mirek wrote on Fri, 15 February 2013 02:33 |
Which IMO nicely demonstrates my point. We can "fix" them, but are we going to forever keep changing standard compliant and fairly tested code only because some compiler developer has a little bit different taste for what deserves warning?
|
Some warnings are simply stupid and this one particularly (one is not using parenthesis because operator precedence rule exists). It should rather be moved to "--best-practices" compiler switch if it existed 
|
|
|
 |
|
Gcc compile option proposal
By: Didier on Thu, 14 February 2013 19:33
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
By: mirek on Thu, 14 February 2013 20:08
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
By: mirek on Thu, 14 February 2013 20:48
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
By: Didier on Thu, 14 February 2013 21:10
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
By: mirek on Thu, 14 February 2013 23:01
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
By: mirek on Thu, 14 February 2013 23:21
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
By: mirek on Thu, 14 February 2013 23:31
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
By: mirek on Fri, 15 February 2013 08:33
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
By: unodgs on Fri, 15 February 2013 11:11
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
By: Didier on Fri, 15 February 2013 17:50
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
By: mirek on Sat, 16 February 2013 18:28
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
By: mirek on Sat, 16 February 2013 11:16
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
|
 |
|
Re: Gcc compile option proposal
By: mirek on Fri, 15 February 2013 19:25
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Aug 04 07:14:55 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.07221 seconds
|