Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Community » PR, media coverage, articles and documentation » A new and quite interesting opinion (on CodeBlocks)
Re: A new and quite interesting opinion [message #4038 is a reply to message #4037] Mon, 17 July 2006 23:34 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 14261
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
Werner wrote on Mon, 17 July 2006 16:23

I just thought it might be informative Twisted Evil - or even funny Laughing - to read this message which I found in the Code::Blocks-forum:

Quote
Well May some of you know something about Ultimate++, does it work on Code::Block
We don't directly support it (there is no template or anything), but there is no reason why you should not be able to use it with Code::Blocks.

Personally, I find the style of Ultimate++ scary (almost repulsive), but what they do is beyond any doubt valid C++, and it is certainly a lot more concise and more efficient than for example wxWidgets. If you can live with this particular coding style (which is a pure matter of taste), then Ultimate++ is a very good thing.

Ultimate++ works with gcc, and therefore you can use Code::Blocks to develop with Ultimate's toolkit (gcc is Code::Blocks' default compiler).
All you have to do is build the library (and create some application templates if you need any).

URL: http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php?topic=3518.msg27759

Werner




Yes, I have noticed that one too. Just a note: you cannot expect them to love us - TheIDE competes with CodeBlocks... Smile (there are other posts about TheIDE in forum I think).

Mirek
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: finding text
Next Topic: Article No2. - on codeproject?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Jun 06 12:35:59 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06095 seconds