Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Community » PR, media coverage, articles and documentation » Let's start - Wikipedia article Nr1.: title and structure
Re: Let's start - Wikipedia article Nr1.: title and structure [message #4204 is a reply to message #4203] Fri, 28 July 2006 20:08 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
fudadmin is currently offline  fudadmin
Messages: 1321
Registered: November 2005
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
Ultimate Contributor
Administrator
rbmatt wrote on Fri, 28 July 2006 19:00

fudadmin wrote on Fri, 28 July 2006 13:38

I think, there must be:
1 general page
for ultimate++ (which I started) pointed from Wikipedia's [application framework] or [software framework]?
(competing among... java, .NET etc.)

2 page "Ultimate++ GUI toolkit" pointed from [gui toolkit]
(competing among QT, wxWidgets, Fox etc.)

3 page "Ultimate++ IDE" pointed from RAD or IDE?
(competing among CodeBlocks, DevC++, Eclipse etc.)

4 page "Ultimate++ Core" or "NTL" pointed from a page which points to STL, BOOST etc.


I can see having separate articles for U++ and TheIDE, but not 4 different ones.
-WxWidgets only has one article that I see.
-We can still do all that linking, I think we can even link to a specific "section" of the U++ article.
-There will be a lot of crossover between 4 articles. That's a lot more content that we need also.


wxWidgets doesn't have:
1. own IDE, packages and building system
2. original libraries STL or BOOST- like ("Core" aka NTL)

It's a question about in how many markets Ultimate++ competes?
Who else wants Ultimate++ to be comparable only to wxWidgets?
Please vote, then...

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Please post here your sentences for Materials for Articles : "Ultimate++ as a set of libraries
Next Topic: Ultimate++ mentioned on Boost (from mailing list)...
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Jun 06 21:29:59 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.16587 seconds