Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » [c++11] Problem with executing callback with Vector
Re: [c++11] Problem with executing callback with Vector [message #44712 is a reply to message #44707] Tue, 02 June 2015 20:35 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 14266
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
Zbych wrote on Sat, 30 May 2015 19:20
mirek wrote on Fri, 29 May 2015 08:32

Passing Vector to callback...

Well, the trouble is you need copy and containers do not have "direct" copy.

Quick fix is IMO to use Callback1< WithDeepCopy< Vector<int> > >.

Another quick fix is to use Value[Array] instead.

If you insist on using Vector directly (both above options come at certain performance penalty), you need to reorganize the code so that you can pass reference or pointer.

Anyway, as long as you want to use PostCallback, I think your example is not correct, as PostCallback accepts simple Callback (no parameters). Perhaps you meant using something like THISBACK1 ?

If so, you could perhaps use lambda to overcome the problem...

Mirek


If you have time, please take a look at ClientHandler::OnProcessMessageReceived from ChromiumBrowser package:
https:// code.google.com/p/upp-mirror/source/browse/trunk/bazaar/Chro miumBrowser/ClientHandler.cpp

This function receives message from V8 rendering process - message name and a vector of values.
I want to convert CefValue to Upp::Value and pass it to GUI thread. The problem is that I don't want to store this vector somewhere and pass a reference since I don't know how long I should keep it. The easiest way is to pass a copy of vector to callback.
But maybe there is some other way. To be honest, I don't know what do you mean by Value[Array].

Regards,
Zbych



I mean ValueArray par, instead of Vector<Value> par.

If you want to keep parameter as const Vector<Value>& (it is certainly nicer), you can perhaps solve it by creating Vector<Value> on the heap, pass pointer to some auxiliary callback in PostCallback (grrr, naked heap pointer... but here it might be acceptable), in this callback call WhenMessage, then delete pointer. Something like

void HelperCallback(Callback1<const Vector<Value>&> target, Vector<Value> *vec) {
target(*vec);
delete vec;
}

....
Vector<Value> *vec = new Vector<Value>();
vec->Add(...);
....
PostCallback(callback(HelperCallback, vec));

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [solved]How to disable "auto access redirect url " of the HttpRequest?
Next Topic: Do you need a read character literal in CParser?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Jul 18 07:13:05 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03827 seconds