U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » LineEdit, EditFields, DocEdit » What do you think about this approach to making CodeEditor more user extendable?

Thu, 17 December 2015 16:15

mirek
Messages: 14267
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

OK, i have no problem with that, but perhaps it is as easy to just check current language, exactly as is happening now?

		What do you think about this approach to making CodeEditor more user extendable? By: cbpporter on Tue, 15 December 2015 12:07
		Re: What do you think about this approach to making CodeEditor more user extendable? By: mirek on Tue, 15 December 2015 12:42
		Re: What do you think about this approach to making CodeEditor more user extendable? By: cbpporter on Tue, 15 December 2015 14:16
		Re: What do you think about this approach to making CodeEditor more user extendable? By: cbpporter on Wed, 16 December 2015 14:53
		Re: What do you think about this approach to making CodeEditor more user extendable? By: koldo on Wed, 16 December 2015 16:16
		Re: What do you think about this approach to making CodeEditor more user extendable? By: mirek on Thu, 17 December 2015 13:29
		Re: What do you think about this approach to making CodeEditor more user extendable? By: mirek on Thu, 17 December 2015 13:30
		Re: What do you think about this approach to making CodeEditor more user extendable? By: cbpporter on Thu, 17 December 2015 13:52
		Re: What do you think about this approach to making CodeEditor more user extendable? By: mirek on Thu, 17 December 2015 16:15
		Re: What do you think about this approach to making CodeEditor more user extendable? By: cbpporter on Thu, 17 December 2015 16:46
		Re: What do you think about this approach to making CodeEditor more user extendable? By: cbpporter on Wed, 13 January 2016 15:38

Previous Topic:	Lost focus in edit fields
Next Topic:	How to do fast Append & scroll in LineEdit with MT?

Goto Forum:

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Aug 26 16:58:25 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05286 seconds