|
|
|
Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » ide: Optimal mode removed
|
|
|
|
| Re: ide: Optimal mode removed [message #46541 is a reply to message #46534] |
Sun, 22 May 2016 05:34   |
nlneilson
Messages: 644
Registered: January 2010
Location: U.S. California. Mojave &...
|
Contributor |
|
|
mirek wrote on Sat, 21 May 2016 06:09As .exe size reduction by using Optimal mode became irrelevant over years, I have removed Optimal mode (and Size / Speed) from theide.
It is now either Debug or Release and options for release are by default set to speed optimization.
Debug or Release seems like a good change.
When will the nightly builds include this change?
edit: upp 9861 has the change
[Updated on: Sun, 22 May 2016 11:18] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: ide: Optimal mode removed [message #46576 is a reply to message #46534] |
Fri, 03 June 2016 01:51 |
Novo
Messages: 1430
Registered: December 2006
|
Ultimate Contributor |
|
|
mirek wrote on Sat, 21 May 2016 09:09As .exe size reduction by using Optimal mode became irrelevant over years, I have removed Optimal mode (and Size / Speed) from theide.
It is now either Debug or Release and options for release are by default set to speed optimization.
Wouldn't it be better to allow user to define his/her own modes/configurations? Inheritance would also be a great option.
I personally usually have at least one extra-mode: Profiling (Release + debug information).
TIA
Regards,
Novo
[Updated on: Fri, 03 June 2016 14:30] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: ide: Optimal mode removed [message #46586 is a reply to message #46580] |
Fri, 03 June 2016 21:07 |
Novo
Messages: 1430
Registered: December 2006
|
Ultimate Contributor |
|
|
mirek wrote on Fri, 03 June 2016 03:03Novo wrote on Fri, 03 June 2016 01:51mirek wrote on Sat, 21 May 2016 09:09As .exe size reduction by using Optimal mode became irrelevant over years, I have removed Optimal mode (and Size / Speed) from theide.
It is now either Debug or Release and options for release are by default set to speed optimization.
Wouldn't it be better to allow user to define his/her own modes/configurations? Inheritance would be also a great option.
I personally usually have at least one extra-mode: Profiling (Release + debug information).
TIA
Uhm, we have just removed "optimal/speed/size" as too complicated 
Anyway, release+debug can be setup in Output mode. I do so quite regulary. Is not that enough?
Mirek
Well, profiling often requires -fno-omit-frame-pointer (as in case of "prof" on Linux).
Optimal was just confusing because there was impossible to set command line arguments in case of Optimal.
In general, the problem is more complicated than just multiple configurations and inheritance, but having multiple user-defined configuration would make life much more easier, and being able to inherit from another configuration would be just amazing.
Regards.
Regards,
Novo
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun May 04 03:22:55 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00380 seconds
|
|
|
Members
Pages
Help
Register
Login
Home
