I think mentioned this before, but Vector, VectorMap and CParser are my favorite classes in U++. This goes only for Core, there are tons of favorites in CtrlLib.

CParser in particular has served me very well for years now, but alas, it is time to move on. Not because there is something wrong with it, but because of one of the projects is:
a. Not C++
b. It could still use CParser, but it feel like overkill but doable to hack C++ inter-op just for one class. The rest of Core is not needed here.

So I'm working on a leaner CParser like class, not in C++, which is re-implemented, so not a simple copy and paste, but in principle it is still the same thing. Sure, it may look a bit different, but on a logical level it is still CParser.

I would also like to OSS this class, under Apache License 2.0.

I have some weird memories of asking this before, but I can't find the thread, so here it goes: how would one go about this?

Nor do I want a 30 page license like: http://www.ultimatepp.org/app$ide$About$en-us.html

Theoretically even if you use just GCC you would have to include a big part of those ~30 page

koldo wrote on Wed, 07 September 2016 10:24

Theoretically even if you use just GCC you would have to include a big part of those ~30 page

What?

Licenses are way to complicated!

Since when does the compiler you choose have to do anything with the license of software you use? The tool versus the object of the license?

We distribute mingw with U++, that is why there is mingw license included.

BTW, for app released, there is now a nice tool "File/Project licenses", which scans packages and creates a complete list of licenses used...
Mirek

BTW, for app released, there is now a nice tool "File/Project licenses", which scans packages and creates a complete list of licenses used...

Are there at least 4 lines of code identical to CParser? If not, you do not need to copy any license by my standards (although some line "Inspired by U++ CParser in the code would be nice...)

def IsChar(c1: Char, c2: Char, c3: Char): Bool; const {
	return term[0] == c1 && term[1] == c2 && term[2] == c3;
}

bool   IsChar3(char c1, char c2, char c3) const { return term[0] == c1 && term[1] == c2 && term[2] == c3; }

I do not see identical lines:)

Mirek

How do you feel about me forking U++ to reduce .so usage to a minimum and NOGTK flag?

Is NOGTK still supported?