Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Community » Coffee corner » gentle criticism of source organization
Re: gentle criticism of source organization [message #4690 is a reply to message #4684] Sun, 20 August 2006 20:06 Go to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 14267
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
Well, the list is here:

http://upp.sourceforge.net/srcdoc$Core$Packages$en-us.html

Anyway, I believe that the right way how to study U++ sources is to use some examples. These

a) Will list just packages necessary for given problem
b) Will allow quick navigation through sources

Directory structure is certainly very different from "standard". However, all weird concepts you can meet with U++ directory structure are direct responses to solve problems with "traditional" approach.

E.g.:

- all (re)sources for package (source unit) should be contained in single directory (-> no separation of include files from sources)

- this directory should not contain intermediate and output files (.obj, .lib, .exe), these should be put somewhere else (e.g. so that you can simply delete the whole folder when running out of space)

- each package should now what else packages it needs to run (handled by TheIDE package system)

- system has to be independent from fixed locations, while allowing to place sources anywhere, even in multiple dirs) (->assembly concept)

Mirek
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Interesting observation - wxWidgets vs U++ .exe size
Next Topic: about Macro
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Aug 17 00:56:28 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06225 seconds