Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » U++ 2017 beta  
	
		
		
			| Re: U++ 2017 beta [message #47186 is a reply to message #47166] | 
			Sun, 25 December 2016 21:29    | 
		 
		
			
				
				
				  | 
					
						  
						Klugier
						 Messages: 1106 Registered: September 2012  Location: Poland, Kraków 
						
					 | 
					Senior Contributor  | 
					 | 
		 
		 
	 | 
 
	
		MrSarup wrote on Sun, 25 December 2016 08:02Hello Mirek, 
The second thing: 
 
In the GCC.bm and CLANG.bm created, the parameter shows the following: 
 
COMMON_CPP_OPTIONS = "-std=c++0x"; 
 
Should it not be focusing on c++11?  
 
Hello MrSarup, 
 
I pushed patch for this issue - can you check tomorrow with nightly builds (It should be package overnight). 
 
Sincerely and thanks for reporting, 
Klugier 
		
		
  U++ - one framework to rule them all.
		[Updated on: Sun, 25 December 2016 21:32] Report message to a moderator  
 |  
	| 
		
	 | 
 
 
 |  
  
 
	
	  | 
	 | 
	
		U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 22 December 2016 09:25  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Thu, 22 December 2016 20:25  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 22 December 2016 23:00  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 08:02  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Klugier on Sun, 25 December 2016 21:29  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  omari on Mon, 26 December 2016 13:36  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	  | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mr_ped on Fri, 23 December 2016 04:02  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  koldo on Fri, 23 December 2016 10:28  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:23  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:52  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 25 December 2016 10:02  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:52  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 11:24  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 21:51  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 28 December 2016 13:31  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 28 December 2016 16:53  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 28 December 2016 20:53  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Klugier on Wed, 28 December 2016 23:15  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  amrein on Thu, 29 December 2016 08:44  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 21:54  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 22:03  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Mon, 02 January 2017 06:09  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Mon, 02 January 2017 22:31  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Mon, 02 January 2017 21:42  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  amrein on Tue, 03 January 2017 14:22  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Tue, 03 January 2017 14:59  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  amrein on Wed, 04 January 2017 01:04  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 07:28  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 07:59  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 08:03  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 08:47  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 09:00  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 10:28  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 12:32  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 12:38  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 13:20  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 14:39  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 15:29  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:38  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Tom1 on Thu, 05 January 2017 09:17  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 14:49  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 15:47  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Klugier on Wed, 04 January 2017 22:32  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:23  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mr_ped on Thu, 05 January 2017 05:01  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:20  
	 | 
  
Goto Forum:
 
 Current Time: Tue Nov 04 04:25:01 CET 2025 
 Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04232 seconds 
 |