Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » U++ 2017 beta  
	
		
		
			| Re: U++ 2017 beta [message #47195 is a reply to message #47194] | 
			Wed, 28 December 2016 13:31    | 
		 
		
			
				
				
				
					
						
						MrSarup
						 Messages: 30 Registered: December 2016 
						
					 | 
					Member  | 
					 | 
		 
		 
	 | 
 
	
		Hello cbpporter, 
cbpporter wrote on Wed, 28 December 2016 13:01 
My review of the beta continues... 
... 
So In conclusion: 
 - The quality of the code in the packages is at its usual high standards and U++ is a great library 
 - installing and ease of getting started is at the same all time low it has been for a year now 
 - MINGW will never be good until Mirek switches over to it fully for at least 2 months, not touching MSC in this period.
  
My review of the community of U++ continues...  
 
I concluded the U++ community is in beta. Thus, I received little support from the community. 
 
Whatever the little support I have received, I would like to draw your attention to my postings here because it related to the compatibility issue you have addressed in your above post: 
 
 http://www.ultimatepp.org/forums/index.php?t=msg&th=9820 &start=0& 
 
Of course, it relates to Linux with Centos and Fedora flavor. So, our conclusion - as a new comer - about the U++ is: 
 
 - DO NOT USE U++ UNTIL IT IS FULLY COMPATIBLE WITH GCC ON LINUX! 
 
Hello Mirek, 
 
I have failed to grasp the intention of developers on launching and maintaining this beautiful project while leaving a very fundamental issue of installation and ease of working with it aside. 
 
It appears to me that developers have really not paid much attention on other platform other than windows + android. 
 
While it works like charm on windows, it does not work as easy on other platform. The Era of Bill's Monopoly is gone. We live in a cross-platform world today. My suggestion to developers for further development: 
 
 - Maintain the beta status further until the cross-platform compatibility is achieved! 
 
 - Freeze everything of what is there TODAY! 
 
 - Work on CROSS PLATFORM CONCEPT FIRST. By making compatible on every platform, provide a much better installer for other platforms, line Centos, Fedora and assure that users could very easily install, compile and re-use examples.  
 
 - Assure that a user has - from install to compile - least headache, at least for new comers.  
 
 - Learn on how to make packages in an efficient matter and provide binary distribution with technologies like FPM. 
 
Have nice holidays ....
		
		
		
 |  
	| 
		
	 | 
 
 
 |  
  
 
	
	  | 
	 | 
	
		U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 22 December 2016 09:25  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Thu, 22 December 2016 20:25  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 22 December 2016 23:00  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 08:02  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Klugier on Sun, 25 December 2016 21:29  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  omari on Mon, 26 December 2016 13:36  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	  | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mr_ped on Fri, 23 December 2016 04:02  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  koldo on Fri, 23 December 2016 10:28  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:23  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:52  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 25 December 2016 10:02  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:52  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 11:24  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 21:51  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 28 December 2016 13:31  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 28 December 2016 16:53  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 28 December 2016 20:53  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Klugier on Wed, 28 December 2016 23:15  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  amrein on Thu, 29 December 2016 08:44  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 21:54  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 22:03  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Mon, 02 January 2017 06:09  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Mon, 02 January 2017 22:31  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Mon, 02 January 2017 21:42  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  amrein on Tue, 03 January 2017 14:22  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Tue, 03 January 2017 14:59  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  amrein on Wed, 04 January 2017 01:04  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 07:28  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 07:59  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 08:03  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 08:47  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 09:00  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 10:28  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 12:32  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 12:38  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 13:20  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 14:39  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 15:29  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:38  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Tom1 on Thu, 05 January 2017 09:17  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 14:49  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 15:47  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Klugier on Wed, 04 January 2017 22:32  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:23  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mr_ped on Thu, 05 January 2017 05:01  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:20  
	 | 
  
Goto Forum:
 
 Current Time: Tue Nov 04 04:25:00 CET 2025 
 Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00453 seconds 
 |