Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » U++ 2017 beta  
	
		
		
			| Re: U++ 2017 beta [message #47332 is a reply to message #47319] | 
			Wed, 04 January 2017 22:32    | 
		 
		
			
				
				
				  | 
					
						  
						Klugier
						 Messages: 1106 Registered: September 2012  Location: Poland, Kraków 
						
					 | 
					Senior Contributor  | 
					 | 
		 
		 
	 | 
 
	
		cbpporter wrote on Wed, 04 January 2017 10:06 
I remember in my old job, we got some senior on one of the U++ projects. Very talented guy and great coder. Didn't want to use use TheIDE, but said he'll use it for a day or two to see what's the deal with the packages and learn the code and the move over to Visual Studio. Soon, he became very angry, cursing TheIDE. I asked what's wrong. He way very explicitly cursing it, saying what kind of an IDE does not have an "Open file" option. He just wanted to open a file to edit it and couldn't do it. I showed him that the option was "Edit file", not "Open file". He never touched TheIDE again, nor U++ or the project. 
  
 
Hello cbpporter, 
 
Good catch   - "Edit file" is now called "Open file". 
 
Sincerely, 
Klugier 
		
		
  U++ - one framework to rule them all.
		[Updated on: Wed, 04 January 2017 22:33] Report message to a moderator  
 |  
	| 
		
	 | 
 
 
 |  
  
 
	
	  | 
	 | 
	
		U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 22 December 2016 09:25  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Thu, 22 December 2016 20:25  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 22 December 2016 23:00  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 08:02  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Klugier on Sun, 25 December 2016 21:29  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  omari on Mon, 26 December 2016 13:36  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	  | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mr_ped on Fri, 23 December 2016 04:02  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  koldo on Fri, 23 December 2016 10:28  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:23  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:52  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 25 December 2016 10:02  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:52  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 11:24  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 21:51  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 28 December 2016 13:31  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 28 December 2016 16:53  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 28 December 2016 20:53  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Klugier on Wed, 28 December 2016 23:15  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  amrein on Thu, 29 December 2016 08:44  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 21:54  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 22:03  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Mon, 02 January 2017 06:09  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Mon, 02 January 2017 22:31  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Mon, 02 January 2017 21:42  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  amrein on Tue, 03 January 2017 14:22  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Tue, 03 January 2017 14:59  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  amrein on Wed, 04 January 2017 01:04  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 07:28  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 07:59  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 08:03  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 08:47  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 09:00  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 10:28  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 12:32  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 12:38  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 13:20  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 14:39  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 15:29  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:38  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Tom1 on Thu, 05 January 2017 09:17  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 14:49  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 15:47  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Klugier on Wed, 04 January 2017 22:32  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:23  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mr_ped on Thu, 05 January 2017 05:01  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:20  
	 | 
  
Goto Forum:
 
 Current Time: Tue Nov 04 04:24:26 CET 2025 
 Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06305 seconds 
 |