Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » U++ 2017 beta  
	
		
		
			| Re: U++ 2017 beta [message #47334 is a reply to message #47333] | 
			Thu, 05 January 2017 08:20   | 
		 
		
			
				
				
				  | 
					
						  
						mirek
						 Messages: 14271 Registered: November 2005 
						
					 | 
					Ultimate Member  | 
					 | 
		 
		 
	 | 
 
	
		mr_ped wrote on Thu, 05 January 2017 05:01About decimal comma. 
 
Well, in Java world you should always provide also the Locale to be used by the formatter. So then you do thing like str = Format(Locale.US, "%.2f", value) when you are exporting data for machine, or you call with other (none=default) to get formatting for human output, which can include also things like thousands separator/etc (and is not suitable for machine export/import). 
 
  
 
Actually, that is in U++ for ages: 
 
String Format(int language, const char *fmt, __List##I(E__NFValue)); 
 
Only you have to use U++ formatters instead of C ones... 
 
Mirek
		
		
		
 |  
	| 
		
	 | 
 
 
 |  
  
 
	
	  | 
	 | 
	
		U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 22 December 2016 09:25  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Thu, 22 December 2016 20:25  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 22 December 2016 23:00  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 08:02  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Klugier on Sun, 25 December 2016 21:29  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  omari on Mon, 26 December 2016 13:36  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	  | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mr_ped on Fri, 23 December 2016 04:02  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  koldo on Fri, 23 December 2016 10:28  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:23  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:52  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 25 December 2016 10:02  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:52  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 11:24  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 21:51  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 28 December 2016 13:31  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 28 December 2016 16:53  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 28 December 2016 20:53  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Klugier on Wed, 28 December 2016 23:15  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  amrein on Thu, 29 December 2016 08:44  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 21:54  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 22:03  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Mon, 02 January 2017 06:09  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Mon, 02 January 2017 22:31  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Mon, 02 January 2017 21:42  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  amrein on Tue, 03 January 2017 14:22  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Tue, 03 January 2017 14:59  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  amrein on Wed, 04 January 2017 01:04  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 07:28  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 07:59  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 08:03  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 08:47  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 09:00  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 10:28  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 12:32  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 12:38  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 13:20  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 14:39  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 15:29  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:38  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Tom1 on Thu, 05 January 2017 09:17  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 14:49  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 15:47  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  Klugier on Wed, 04 January 2017 22:32  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:23  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mr_ped on Thu, 05 January 2017 05:01  
	 | 
 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		Re: U++ 2017 beta
		By:  mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:20  
	 | 
  
Goto Forum:
 
 Current Time: Tue Nov 04 04:31:50 CET 2025 
 Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01265 seconds 
 |