U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Clang / lld (

) 1 Vote

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 [message #51729 is a reply to message #51728]

Fri, 03 May 2019 17:49

Novo
Messages: 1430
Registered: December 2006

Ultimate Contributor

cbpporter wrote on Fri, 03 May 2019 09:11

Next, we need to use clang to compile .

I personally would recommend to be careful with clang. I always thought that clang on Linux is the best C++ compiler ever, but a few days ago I've ported my old app written for msvc to clang and got very unpleasant results. The app itself is big and complicated, written in 99.99% C++98 (keyword "auto" is used only once), but it has a lot of CRTP, static visitors and similar stuff. Now the app won't compile with GCC and MSVC, and it is crashing in the places where it used to work before.

IMHO, ideally, U++ should be tested against GCC, MSVC, and Clang.

Regards,
Novo

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Clang / lld By: Novo on Fri, 19 April 2019 22:50
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Sat, 20 April 2019 00:56
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: Novo on Sat, 20 April 2019 01:05
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Tue, 23 April 2019 16:38
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: Novo on Tue, 23 April 2019 17:29
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Wed, 24 April 2019 09:04
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: cbpporter on Wed, 24 April 2019 09:50
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Wed, 24 April 2019 10:51
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Wed, 24 April 2019 10:56
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Wed, 24 April 2019 14:45
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Thu, 25 April 2019 07:57
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: Novo on Thu, 25 April 2019 16:14
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: cbpporter on Fri, 03 May 2019 10:27
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Fri, 03 May 2019 11:50
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: cbpporter on Fri, 03 May 2019 15:11
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: Novo on Fri, 03 May 2019 17:49
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Sat, 04 May 2019 08:48
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: Tom1 on Fri, 10 May 2019 11:49
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: mirek on Sat, 11 May 2019 16:05
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: Novo on Sat, 11 May 2019 19:29
		Re: Possible new package or overhaul proposals for U++ in 2019 By: Tom1 on Mon, 13 May 2019 09:37

Previous Topic:	Two new nasty GCC warnings that I am going to disable
Next Topic:	Example websocket SSL

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Aug 25 22:11:44 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06120 seconds