Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » 2024rc1
Re: 2024rc1 [message #61032 is a reply to message #61030] Mon, 21 October 2024 02:27 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Lance is currently offline  Lance
Messages: 656
Registered: March 2007
Contributor
with the u++ moving to c++17,

code like this (Core/Vcont.h line 13)
	void Malloc(size_t size) {
		if(std::is_trivially_destructible<T>::value)
			ptr = (T *)MemoryAlloc(size * sizeof(T));
		else {
			void *p = MemoryAlloc(size * sizeof(T) + 16);
			*(size_t *)p = size;
			ptr = (T *)((byte *)p + 16);
		}
	}

can benefit from constexpr-if compile time trimming to produce more compact and faster binary (theoretically). I was wondering if u++ is open to such minor, insignificant improvements.

I just happen to encounter these lines Laughing
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon14.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon14.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Win32 openssl updated to 3.2.1 version
Next Topic: SetRect "MegaRect" support...
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jun 08 20:59:24 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04067 seconds