Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » brc sample problem
brc sample problem [message #7575] Sun, 07 January 2007 11:30 Go to next message
MikeP is currently offline  MikeP
Messages: 4
Registered: January 2007
Junior Member
I have problem with compilation of brc\ship sample.

C:\devel\upp\reference\brc\ship\ship.cpp: In function 'void ConsoleMainFn_()':
C:\devel\upp\reference\brc\ship\ship.cpp:11: error: no matching function for call to 'BZ2Decompress(Upp::MemReadStream)'
C:/devel/upp/uppsrc/plugin/bz2/bz2.h:7: note: candidates are: Upp::String Upp::BZ2Decompress(Upp::String, Upp::Gate2<int, int>)
C:/devel/upp/uppsrc/plugin/bz2/bz2.h:8: note: Upp::String Upp::BZ2Decompress(Upp::Stream&, Upp::Gate2<int, int>)
C:/devel/upp/uppsrc/plugin/bz2/bz2.h:10: note: void Upp::BZ2Decompress(Upp::Stream&, Upp::Stream&, Upp::Gate2<int, int>)
brc\ship: 1 file(s) built in (0:01.25), 1250 msecs / file, duration = 1266 msecs, parallelization 0%

I´m using MINGW compiler. New installation. U++ 612 dev3.

PS: I must say, that U++ is piece of excellent work Smile

[Updated on: Sun, 07 January 2007 13:09]

Report message to a moderator

Re: brc sample problem [message #7576 is a reply to message #7575] Sun, 07 January 2007 12:02 Go to previous message
Balage is currently offline  Balage
Messages: 17
Registered: December 2006
Promising Member
You might also want to read the end of this thread regarding BRC-s:

http://www.ultimatepp.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=1641& amp; amp;start=0&

I don't know if the issues explained there are fixed yet or not.

[Updated on: Sun, 07 January 2007 12:03]

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: How to check, if a file is locked by another application?
Next Topic: Error in Gccbuilder
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Apr 27 23:39:40 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03137 seconds