|
|
Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » Upp 2007.1 released
|
|
Re: Upp 2007.1 released [message #9018 is a reply to message #9013] |
Thu, 12 April 2007 16:03   |
ebojd
Messages: 225 Registered: January 2007 Location: USA
|
Experienced Member |
|
|
mr_ped wrote on Wed, 11 April 2007 13:51 |
Overall I think too many living versions are not a very good idea, it may be quite confusing in forums and support.
|
I agree. What I had in mind and I was brainstorming above is how to deal with supporting projects that in essence uses legacy code in the same IDE. If we set up a CVS/SVN/etc. tree with branch tags, we can use those as what I have been calling named slots. From there the package organizer would have to know what slot/branch tag is being compiled against (uploading if necessary). The same mechanism would allow the developers to set up special branch tags or aliases for LIVE, CURRENT-STABLE, CURRENT-DEVEL, as well as upp-605-stable.
Just some thoughts following on from which at this point has gotten WAY off Topic 
luzr wrote on Thu, 12 April 2007 07:36 |
I agree.
In fact, in this respect, "development" proved to be a double-edged sword. It is excellent for having everything tested soon, but it got us lazy about releasing "majors".
|
How about starting a list of things that you or others want to see for the next revision/release? That way as we tick off the tasks we know when it is reasonable to call for a new release/revision. anything else that made it in is gravy, and if there has been WAY tom many minor changes but the revision issues are not resolved, then maybe it can be called a subrevision or the remaining issues can be put off to the next cycle 
Just some thoughts...
EBo --
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Upp 2007.1 released [message #9112 is a reply to message #8980] |
Wed, 18 April 2007 00:27   |
waxblood
Messages: 95 Registered: January 2007
|
Member |
|
|
I have Xubuntu 6.10
bunch of problems, here
a) deb package misses to install gdb, so when upp is asked to debug a program it correctly tells it had an error invoking gdb, but after that it exits immediately.
b) If I try to run reference/Paint it fails this assertion
Executing: "/home/da/upp/out/GCC.Debug.Gui.Shared.So/Paint"
Assertion failed in /home/da/upp/uppsrc/Draw/DrawX11.cpp, line 372
i >= 0 && i < 4
When I try to debug it when upp encounters the problem it doesn't go to the error line, it only displays the assembly trace. Is it normal? The function copy backtrace copies a void string, too (the disass copy works)
FFFFE400 push ecx
FFFFE401 push edx
FFFFE402 push ebp
FFFFE403 mov ebp,esp <-- here is the problem
FFFFE405 sysenter
FFFFE407 nop
FFFFE408 nop
FFFFE409 nop
FFFFE40A nop
FFFFE40B nop
FFFFE40C nop
FFFFE40D nop
FFFFE40E jmp 0xFFFFE403
FFFFE410 pop ebp
FFFFE411 pop edx
FFFFE412 pop ecx
FFFFE413 ret
FFFFE414 nop
FFFFE415 nop
FFFFE416 nop
FFFFE417 nop
FFFFE418 nop
FFFFE419 nop
FFFFE41A nop
FFFFE41B nop
FFFFE41C nop
FFFFE41D nop
FFFFE41E nop
FFFFE41F nop
------------------------------------
c) Keys to set bookmarks don't work. I have an italian keyboard.
When pressing Control + Shift + 0 I get this in AK Setup
Ctrl+Shift+[=]
When pressing Control + Shift + x (x is a number bar 0) I get
Ctrl+Shift+1002x
Please make this work or let user set his own bookmark keys otherwise working in Linux without bookmarks is gonna be hard...
d) well, this is not a real problem, but on Linux I really like the middle-click paste after selection, and I miss it a lot in upp...
Ciao,
David
|
|
|
|
Re: Upp 2007.1 released [message #9137 is a reply to message #9136] |
Wed, 18 April 2007 18:54   |
 |
mirek
Messages: 14255 Registered: November 2005
|
Ultimate Member |
|
|
Thank you. Fixes:
void Draw::DrawEllipseOp(const Rect& r, Color color, int pen, Color pencolor)
{
DrawLock __;
SetLineStyle(pen);
if(!IsNull(color)) {
SetForeground(color);
XFillArc(Xdisplay, dw, gc, r.left + actual_offset.x, r.top + actual_offset.y,
r.Width() - 1, r.Height() - 1, 0, 360 * 64);
}
if(!IsNull(pencolor) && !IsNull(pen)) {
SetForeground(pencolor);
XDrawArc(Xdisplay, dw, gc, r.left + actual_offset.x, r.top + actual_offset.y,
r.Width() - 1, r.Height() - 1, 0, 360 * 64);
}
}
.......
void Draw::SetLineStyle(int width)
{
DrawLock __;
if(IsDrawing()) return;
if(width == linewidth) return;
linewidth = width;
if(IsNull(width))
width = 1;
if(width < PEN_SOLID) {
static const char dash[] = { 18, 6 };
static const char dot[] = { 3, 3 };
static const char dashdot[] = { 9, 6, 3, 6 };
static const char dashdotdot[] = { 9, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3 };
static struct {
const char *dash;
int len;
} ds[] = {
dash, __countof(dash),
dot, __countof(dot),
dashdot, __countof(dashdot),
dashdotdot, __countof(dashdotdot)
};
int i = -(width - PEN_DASH);
ASSERT(i >= 0 && i < 4);
XSetDashes(Xdisplay, gc, 0, ds[i].dash, ds[i].len);
}
XSetLineAttributes(Xdisplay, gc, max(width, 1),
width < PEN_SOLID ? LineOnOffDash : LineSolid, CapRound, JoinRound);
}
Hm, maybe we can keep the system simple: I will accumulate critical patches here and perhaps we can make something like 2007.1a based on them when they reach some critical mass... (means, somebody will apply them to 2007.1 sources).
Mirek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Apr 26 14:40:56 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01321 seconds
|
|
|