U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Extra libraries, Code snippets, applications etc. » OS Problems etc., Win32, POSIX, MacOS, FreeBSD, X11 etc » Win_CE

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Win_CE [message #10925 is a reply to message #10919]

Sun, 05 August 2007 10:47

arturbac
Messages: 91
Registered: May 2007
Location: Reda, Poland

Member

shalom wrote on Sat, 04 August 2007 23:58

I don't know what compilers you people were using, and exactly what you managed to do.
I am using the Mingw32 version of cegcc (i.e. arm-wince-mingw32ce-gcc)

1. Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.60131 for ARM
2. Code generated by mingw for win32 can be 50 times slower than by other avaialbe compilers for win32(just try for example ntbench). So using mingwce for WinCe propably is mistake...

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Win_CE By: arturbac on Fri, 06 July 2007 23:06
		Re: Win_CE By: arturbac on Fri, 06 July 2007 23:36
		Re: Win_CE By: mirek on Fri, 27 July 2007 13:25
		Re: Win_CE By: mirek on Fri, 27 July 2007 13:29
		Re: Win_CE By: arturbac on Sat, 28 July 2007 21:45
		Re: Win_CE By: shalom on Sat, 04 August 2007 23:58
		Re: Win_CE By: arturbac on Sun, 05 August 2007 10:47
		Re: Win_CE By: shalom on Sun, 05 August 2007 15:27
		Re: Win_CE By: arturbac on Sun, 05 August 2007 16:13
		Re: Win_CE By: mirek on Sun, 05 August 2007 17:18
		Re: Win_CE By: shalom on Sun, 05 August 2007 03:33
		Re: Win_CE By: shalom on Mon, 06 August 2007 08:52

Previous Topic:	BSDs: Is there "int get_nprocs (void)"
Next Topic:	Vista Build Error

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed May 14 22:34:45 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01713 seconds