Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » U++ Library support » U++ SQL » SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ???
Re: SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ??? [message #11306 is a reply to message #11297] Mon, 03 September 2007 00:14 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 14261
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
In 99% of cases, you use the first one.

"SQL &" throws an exception on error. Usually, with transactional RDBMS, using transaction block over exceptions is easier (even if not completely optimal), so it less often used.

"SQL * ::Select" is a bug, should be "SQL * UPP::Select", in what example you have spotted it? This has to be used in case when there is method named "Select" (name clash problem resolved by fully qualifying the name).

Mirek
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Syntactic sugar
Next Topic: MSSQL new strange story :)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jun 22 20:01:15 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04217 seconds