U++ framework: U++ SQL » SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ???

Home » U++ Library support » U++ SQL » SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ???

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ??? [message #11306 is a reply to message #11297]

Mon, 03 September 2007 00:14

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

In 99% of cases, you use the first one.

"SQL &" throws an exception on error. Usually, with transactional RDBMS, using transaction block over exceptions is easier (even if not completely optimal), so it less often used.

"SQL * ::Select" is a bug, should be "SQL * UPP::Select", in what example you have spotted it? This has to be used in case when there is method named "Select" (name clash problem resolved by fully qualifying the name).

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		SQL, SQL&, SQL:: ??? By: jeremyc on Sat, 01 September 2007 21:34
		Re: SQL, SQL&, SQL:: ??? By: mirek on Mon, 03 September 2007 00:14
		Re: SQL, SQL&, SQL:: ??? By: sergeynikitin on Thu, 27 November 2008 19:21
		Re: SQL, SQL&, SQL:: ??? By: unodgs on Thu, 27 November 2008 20:19
		Re: SQL, SQL&, SQL:: ??? By: unodgs on Thu, 27 November 2008 20:24

Previous Topic:	Syntactic sugar
Next Topic:	MSSQL new strange story :)

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Nov 05 20:02:49 GMT+1 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08219 seconds