U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ SQL » SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ???

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ??? [message #11306 is a reply to message #11297]

Mon, 03 September 2007 00:14

mirek is currently offline

mirek
Messages: 14261
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

In 99% of cases, you use the first one.

"SQL &" throws an exception on error. Usually, with transactional RDBMS, using transaction block over exceptions is easier (even if not completely optimal), so it less often used.

"SQL * ::Select" is a bug, should be "SQL * UPP::Select", in what example you have spotted it? This has to be used in case when there is method named "Select" (name clash problem resolved by fully qualifying the name).

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		SQL, SQL&, SQL:: ??? By: jeremyc on Sat, 01 September 2007 21:34
		Re: SQL, SQL&, SQL:: ??? By: mirek on Mon, 03 September 2007 00:14
		Re: SQL, SQL&, SQL:: ??? By: sergeynikitin on Thu, 27 November 2008 19:21
		Re: SQL, SQL&, SQL:: ??? By: unodgs on Thu, 27 November 2008 20:19
		Re: SQL, SQL&, SQL:: ??? By: unodgs on Thu, 27 November 2008 20:24

Previous Topic:	Syntactic sugar
Next Topic:	MSSQL new strange story :)

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Sun Jun 22 20:01:15 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04217 seconds