Home » U++ Library support » U++ Libraries and TheIDE: i18n, Unicode and Internationalization » 16 bits wchar
Re: 16 bits wchar [message #11938 is a reply to message #11925] |
Wed, 03 October 2007 06:16   |
cbpporter
Messages: 1427 Registered: September 2007
|
Ultimate Contributor |
|
|
luzr wrote on Mon, 01 October 2007 14:28 |
I guess fixing Utf8 routines to provide UTF16 surrogate support (for now) is a good idea.
|
Great! On the side note though, I am extending Utf8 methods to handle 4 byte long encodings, not UTF-16 surrogate pairs (which are illegal in UTF-8).
Quote: |
Also, I do not think that any string manipulation routine everywhere ever should be aware about UTF-8 or UTF-16 encoding. It is much practical to covert to WString, process and (eventually) convert it back. I think that in the long run, it might be even faster.
|
That could be an acceptable compromise. But a few processing functions couldn't hurt when you really want to process that string in place.
Quote: |
Anyway, seriously, I believe that the ultimate solution is to go with sizeof(wchar) = 4... The only trouble is converting this to UTF16 and back in Win32 everywhere... OTOH, good news is that after the system code is fixed, the transition does not pose too much backwards compatibility problems...
|
I think you should keep UTF-16 as default for Win32 and UTF-32 as default for Linux. Win32 and .NET both use UTF-16 (with surrogates - Win98 doesn't support surrogates, but the rest do), so I think the future of character encoding for GUI purposes is pretty well defined.
I started working on GetUtf8. I tried to keep everything as close to your style of designing things, but I have two questions.
1. I couldn’t find any function that reads or writes UTF-8 strings (only a single char). The rest of the functions read using pain byte storage. This is OK for storing strings, but when loading them, I need a UTF-8 aware method.
2. Your GetUtf8 method is quite straightforward, but I'm afraid it does not decode values correctly.
Here is a pseudo code of what you do:
if(code <= 0x7F)
compute 1 byte value
else if (code <= 0xDF)
compute 2 byte value
else if (code <= 0xEF)
compute 3 byte value
else if (...)
pretty much just read them and return "space"
The issue with this is for the invalid value range 80-C1 which is handled by you second if clause. These values are invalid in UTF-8, but you still decode them using their value and the value of the next character. If this is done for error-escaping, the UTF-8 standard expects to error escape only the current character and start procesing the next one and not to build the error escaped code by using more than the absolute minimum number of code-units (in this case one).
|
|
|
 |
|
16 bits wchar
By: riri on Mon, 05 February 2007 17:19
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 05 February 2007 23:07
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: cbpporter on Tue, 25 September 2007 22:03
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 25 September 2007 23:18
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: cbpporter on Wed, 26 September 2007 07:43
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 26 September 2007 08:48
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: sergei on Wed, 26 September 2007 14:55
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: cbpporter on Wed, 26 September 2007 15:37
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 26 September 2007 22:40
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 01 October 2007 14:28
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:11
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:42
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:26
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 12:10
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 21:40
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Thu, 04 October 2007 17:33
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 12 October 2007 11:52
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 12 October 2007 11:59
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 12 October 2007 17:03
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sun, 21 October 2007 20:19
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sun, 21 October 2007 23:57
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 22 October 2007 10:47
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 22 October 2007 19:37
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sun, 21 October 2007 20:14
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: sergei on Wed, 26 September 2007 01:56
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: sergei on Wed, 26 September 2007 16:54
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: cbpporter on Wed, 26 September 2007 19:11
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 24 October 2007 13:27
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sat, 27 October 2007 11:11
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 09 November 2007 10:39
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sun, 11 November 2007 18:45
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 23 July 2008 22:04
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 04 August 2008 15:07
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 04 August 2008 17:14
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:03
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:14
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:20
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:26
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:51
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 10:42
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 15:12
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 15:19
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Thu, 07 August 2008 16:10
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Thu, 07 August 2008 17:40
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Thu, 07 August 2008 20:01
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 08 August 2008 15:32
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 08 August 2008 18:25
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: cbpporter on Fri, 05 September 2008 19:13
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sun, 07 September 2008 13:24
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 04 August 2008 15:03
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sat, 27 October 2007 11:01
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Apr 28 13:19:38 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00644 seconds
|