U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem...

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... [message #12401 is a reply to message #12399]

Sat, 27 October 2007 19:04

sergei is currently offline

sergei
Messages: 94
Registered: September 2007

Member

luzr wrote on Sat, 27 October 2007 18:27

Quote:

P.S. MSVC8 simply denies building U++ with /O2 (outside TheIDE). Unless I always use manual commandline with all optimization options (excluding /Og), it hangs/crashes on linkage. And with these options I have a larger EXE Confused

Confused

- 1.8 MB vs 1.3MB in TheIDE + O2 vs 1.4MB in TheIDE with same options (that's even weirder - simply using a lib adds 0.4MB?).

With SCU?

Mirek

No, Lib (you didn't answer my post regarding SCU so I paused it for a while). I tried different combinations (Lib with O2, program with manual, reverse, etc.), but results are the same - unless both Lib and the program that uses it are built without O2 (e.g. no optimizations at all or custom optimizations), linker either hangs (usually when using custom in the program and O2 in Lib) or crashes (when using O2 in program). Building release with custom optimizations in both works, but as I said, I get larger EXE (even larger than in TheIDE if I replace O2 with custom optimizations there).

While 0.4-0.5MB aren't that significant, that's quite annyoing since I don't see a decent reason for such increase.

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: mirek on Sun, 09 September 2007 23:55
		Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: Novo on Mon, 10 September 2007 19:44
		Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: mirek on Mon, 10 September 2007 19:50
		Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: Novo on Mon, 10 September 2007 19:53
		Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: mirek on Thu, 20 September 2007 14:59
		Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: mirek on Mon, 22 October 2007 17:43
		Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: sergei on Wed, 24 October 2007 14:42
		Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: mirek on Wed, 24 October 2007 15:11
		Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: sergei on Sat, 27 October 2007 18:04
		Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: mirek on Sat, 27 October 2007 18:27
		Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: sergei on Sat, 27 October 2007 19:04
		Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: mirek on Sat, 27 October 2007 19:33
		Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: sergei on Sat, 27 October 2007 21:53
		Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: sergei on Sun, 28 October 2007 02:55
		Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: okigan on Mon, 12 November 2007 07:15
		Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: mirek on Mon, 12 November 2007 10:08
		Re: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem... By: Novo on Mon, 10 September 2007 20:01

Previous Topic:	Core chat... (reference counted pointers etc.)
Next Topic:	SVN plan...

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Sun May 11 23:11:28 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00357 seconds