am_upp Messages: 3 Registered: March 2006 Location: Germany
Junior Member
luzr wrote on Fri, 03 March 2006 12:18
To tell the truth, we were considering "upp" namaspecs many times over th years, but always came to conclusion that the only "benefit" it would have would be adding "using upp;" into all sources...
It would be a minor change to source code but would solve a major problem (at least for those who have that problem).
For the time being do you know a workaround to avoid these name clashes? Should I try to put the U++ symbols into a namespace by myself?
Members
Pages
Help
Register
Login
Home
