Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » "better" version of Iscale functions
Re: "better" version of Iscale functions [message #15227 is a reply to message #15214] Thu, 10 April 2008 15:07 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mdelfede is currently offline  mdelfede
Messages: 1308
Registered: September 2007
Ultimate Contributor
luzr wrote on Thu, 10 April 2008 02:44

Now, this is an argument Smile

Applied. (I have deleted float version altogether - either it is MSC on Win32 which is unable to do it right using int64, or it is GCC or MSC on ARM and ARM does not have FP).

Mirek


Well, even if usually MSC optimizes better than GCC, that's not always true Smile
BTW, I'm surprised on how bad does it MSC, having hardware instruction on x86 processors for 32x32->64 bit multiply (signed AND unsigned) and 64/32->32 bit divide. Maybe they're still anchored to good old 8088 assembly code... Smile

Max
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: The very strange xterm issue
Next Topic: rvalue vs Pick
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jul 08 17:04:07 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03789 seconds