U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types [message #17113 is a reply to message #17112]

Tue, 29 July 2008 16:03

cbpporter
Messages: 1427
Registered: September 2007

Ultimate Contributor

Well I guess we can leave it as is for performance reasons, but then we should add an entry to "U++ traps and pitfalls". This behavior should be documented somewhere, made very clear especially for pointers. Using pointers in Vector is not that common, so when you start using them it can be a nasty surprise that the values are not null checkable.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 10:51
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mr_ped on Tue, 29 July 2008 10:52
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:10
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mr_ped on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:13
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:20
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mirek on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:24
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 16:03
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mirek on Tue, 29 July 2008 18:39
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 21:55
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mr_ped on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:22

Previous Topic:	zlib
Next Topic:	Interesting struggle with "Moveable<T>" usage in GCC

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Jun 17 00:30:07 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08326 seconds