Home » U++ Library support » U++ Libraries and TheIDE: i18n, Unicode and Internationalization » 16 bits wchar
Re: 16 bits wchar [message #17282 is a reply to message #17277] |
Tue, 05 August 2008 15:57   |
cbpporter
Messages: 1428 Registered: September 2007
|
Ultimate Contributor |
|
|
luzr wrote on Tue, 05 August 2008 16:12 |
Well, I was studying this as well and came to conclusion that combining is of little concern.
First, AFAIK, basic Unicode "compliance" does not requite it.
Second, all important ("real") combining codepoints have characters in Unicode.
|
Sure, it does not require it, but is relatively easy to implement. I have a pretty clear idea on how to do it. But you are right, it's not a priority right now.
Quote: |
This is because there is no general way how to create combined glyph....
|
Compute size of base character, retrieve align of character that is combined with, align in a rect that has the size as a maximum of both and draw. Basically in pseudocode:
draw(curx, cury, basechar);
draw(curx + deltax, cury + deltay, combinedchar);
Finding out delta is not that easy, but doable. This is pretty much what Qt (empirically determined) does and is near perfect.
Quote: |
Does not make sense to me... 
|
Was doesn't make sense. Basically what I said is that you cant feed composed characters to an editable control. And expect align and keyboard/mouse navigation to work.
Quote: |
IMO, this would be pretty hard to address in fact. Or result in confusing user interface.
|
I don't understand why this affects user interface. Everything looks the same from the point of view of the user.
Quote: |
Actually, we do not. Interface accepts strings. But I doubt it manages combining.
|
You are doing:
for(int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
wchar h = text[i];
XftDrawString16(...,(FcChar16 *)&h, 1);
That's drawing characters one at a time (if angle is not zero). If a composition system is available, in this case it will not trigger because drawing characters that are used for composition one at a time doesn't make any sense.
But if angle is zero, you are right. I guess that it does not do composition.
The offline scan seems like a good idea.
|
|
|
 |
|
16 bits wchar
By: riri on Mon, 05 February 2007 17:19
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 05 February 2007 23:07
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: cbpporter on Tue, 25 September 2007 22:03
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 25 September 2007 23:18
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: cbpporter on Wed, 26 September 2007 07:43
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 26 September 2007 08:48
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: sergei on Wed, 26 September 2007 14:55
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: cbpporter on Wed, 26 September 2007 15:37
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 26 September 2007 22:40
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 01 October 2007 14:28
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:11
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:42
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:26
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 12:10
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 21:40
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Thu, 04 October 2007 17:33
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 12 October 2007 11:52
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 12 October 2007 11:59
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 12 October 2007 17:03
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sun, 21 October 2007 20:19
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sun, 21 October 2007 23:57
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 22 October 2007 10:47
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 22 October 2007 19:37
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sun, 21 October 2007 20:14
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: sergei on Wed, 26 September 2007 01:56
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: sergei on Wed, 26 September 2007 16:54
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: cbpporter on Wed, 26 September 2007 19:11
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 24 October 2007 13:27
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sat, 27 October 2007 11:11
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 09 November 2007 10:39
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sun, 11 November 2007 18:45
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 23 July 2008 22:04
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 04 August 2008 15:07
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 04 August 2008 17:14
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:03
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:14
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:20
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:26
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:51
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 10:42
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 15:12
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 15:19
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Thu, 07 August 2008 16:10
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Thu, 07 August 2008 17:40
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Thu, 07 August 2008 20:01
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 08 August 2008 15:32
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 08 August 2008 18:25
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: cbpporter on Fri, 05 September 2008 19:13
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sun, 07 September 2008 13:24
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 04 August 2008 15:03
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sat, 27 October 2007 11:01
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Aug 25 03:20:16 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08519 seconds
|