U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » [FEATURE REQUEST] could Alloc fail a little more gracefully?

Wed, 27 August 2008 12:49

mirek
Messages: 14266
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

nixnixnix wrote on Tue, 26 August 2008 19:49

Is there a way that UPP users could setup their app for their chosen maximum image size?

Nick

I am not sure I understand the question....

Mirek

		[FEATURE REQUEST] could Alloc fail a little more gracefully? By: nixnixnix on Sat, 23 August 2008 00:53
		Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] could Alloc fail a little more gracefully? By: cas_ on Sat, 23 August 2008 20:10
		Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] could Alloc fail a little more gracefully? By: mirek on Sun, 24 August 2008 16:31
		Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] could Alloc fail a little more gracefully? By: mirek on Sun, 24 August 2008 16:36
		Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] could Alloc fail a little more gracefully? By: nixnixnix on Wed, 27 August 2008 01:49
		Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] could Alloc fail a little more gracefully? By: mirek on Wed, 27 August 2008 12:49
		Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] could Alloc fail a little more gracefully? By: amrein on Fri, 29 August 2008 19:52
		Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] could Alloc fail a little more gracefully? By: nixnixnix on Sat, 30 August 2008 19:54
		Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] could Alloc fail a little more gracefully? By: mirek on Sat, 30 August 2008 20:20
		Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] could Alloc fail a little more gracefully? By: zsolt on Sat, 30 August 2008 22:26
		Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] could Alloc fail a little more gracefully? By: mirek on Sun, 31 August 2008 09:19
		Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] could Alloc fail a little more gracefully? By: mirek on Sun, 31 August 2008 09:22
		Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] could Alloc fail a little more gracefully? By: nixnixnix on Mon, 01 September 2008 20:36

Previous Topic:	StrIntValue -> uses int64
Next Topic:	Full Support for timezone/DST [FEATURE REQUEST]

Goto Forum:

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Jul 20 00:58:35 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03625 seconds