Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » U++ talk
| Re: U++ talk [message #17925 is a reply to message #17922] |
Wed, 03 September 2008 09:58   |
 |
mirek
Messages: 14267
Registered: November 2005
|
Ultimate Member |
|
|
| amrein wrote on Tue, 02 September 2008 17:37 |
| Quote: |
It's not about creating translation (current system is working great) as contributing documentation. Someone has to write the documentation directly in the source code. That means write access is needed, plus someone has to test that it still compiles.
|
At present, people use topic++ right? They save the doc in external files. What I said: do exactly the same process. The document manager (not his subordinates) can have a look into the topic++ work (what his subordinate, those without write access to the code, have done) than, if he think that all is ok, he presses a topic++ button and all validated modifications are synchronized back into the source file, ready for doxygen and U++ final release.
| Quote: |
If user doesn't have write access, somebody needs to merge the changes for him.
|
Yes, modifications has to be validated. U++ API can break at any time before final release. Two eyes are better than one. You keep total control of the final documentation submitted but your contributors have full access to the topic++ generated documentation.
|
OK, now I see where are you heading. Anyway, this is even more complex that what we wanted to do. And, let me say, perhaps a little bit more risky too.
OTOH, it appears that you would like to do some work on .so etc.
Maybe, as part of this process, you can do exactly this.
I mean, it appears that ".so" work will have to somehow take existing uppsrc and via some nice tool transform it to .so (or, rather, something with makefile that produces .so).
The T++ contains enough information (ok, barely enough, but it is manageable) to put the comments back to the code even now. So do it!
Or, maybe, you can export doxygen to separate files, that is even easier.
BTW, to put things into perspective and understand each other, if you are speaking about Doxygen, I was thinking about putting docs into sources, that is why confusion. Exporting Doxygen formatted docs from T++ is IMO completely unrelated topic and perhaps a good idea, if it can be done with relatively low costs.
Mirek
|
|
|
|
 |
|
U++ talk
By: amrein on Mon, 01 September 2008 14:43 |
|
|
Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro?
By: cbpporter on Mon, 01 September 2008 15:00 |
|
|
Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro?
By: guido on Mon, 01 September 2008 23:32 |
|
|
Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro?
By: amrein on Tue, 02 September 2008 11:38 |
|
|
Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro?
By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 14:22 |
|
|
Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro?
By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 10:06 |
|
|
Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro?
By: amrein on Tue, 02 September 2008 12:45 |
|
|
Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro?
By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 13:53 |
|
|
Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro?
By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 14:17 |
|
|
Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro?
By: cbpporter on Tue, 02 September 2008 14:19 |
|
|
Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro?
By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 14:29 |
|
|
Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro?
By: captainc on Tue, 02 September 2008 16:22 |
|
|
Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro?
By: mirek on Wed, 10 September 2008 19:26 |
|
|
Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro?
By: mirek on Wed, 03 September 2008 09:49 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: amrein on Tue, 02 September 2008 20:47 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 21:23 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 21:24 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: amrein on Tue, 02 September 2008 22:20 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 23:20 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: cbpporter on Tue, 02 September 2008 22:30 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 23:22 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: amrein on Tue, 02 September 2008 23:37 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: captainc on Wed, 03 September 2008 03:44 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: mirek on Wed, 03 September 2008 09:58 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: cbpporter on Wed, 03 September 2008 10:23 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: mirek on Wed, 03 September 2008 11:10 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: amrein on Wed, 03 September 2008 18:52 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: mirek on Wed, 03 September 2008 22:55 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: mirek on Wed, 03 September 2008 23:00 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: cbpporter on Thu, 04 September 2008 04:52 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: mr_ped on Thu, 04 September 2008 09:30 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: mirek on Thu, 04 September 2008 12:45 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: amrein on Thu, 04 September 2008 13:41 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: mirek on Thu, 04 September 2008 21:55 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: amrein on Thu, 04 September 2008 13:38 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: mirek on Thu, 04 September 2008 21:54 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: amrein on Thu, 04 September 2008 23:06 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: amrein on Thu, 04 September 2008 23:28 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
|
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: Novo on Mon, 08 September 2008 05:01 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: mirek on Mon, 08 September 2008 08:23 |
|
|
Re: U++ talk
|
|
|
Re: U++ talk
By: mr_ped on Mon, 08 September 2008 11:16 |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Aug 24 20:20:26 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08046 seconds
|
Members
Pages
Help
Register
Login
Home
