U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » U++ talk

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: U++ talk [message #17929 is a reply to message #17928]

Wed, 03 September 2008 11:10

mirek is currently offline

mirek
Messages: 14267
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

cbpporter wrote on Wed, 03 September 2008 04:23

Yes, we should go forward and get started on .so. The question is how many .sos should we create.

On possible layout would be: one for Core and other non GUI stuff, one For CtrLib and all control and draw

Well, it might not be actual now, but in future, I would like to have "pure" Draw that is not related to X11, to support web applications (which want to draw images, but do not want to have X11 dependency). But that can wait.

Related problem - Image formats. Should it contain all of them? Maybe yes...

Quote:

, and one for each SQL dialect.

And one for SQL as whole and another for SQL GUI....

Or, maybe, generic Sql can be part of 'core.so' (there are no dependencies) and SQL GUI can be part of 'ctrllib.so' ?

Quote:

Also, I don't know what to do with NOGTK versions of GUI packages. Linking a NOGTK app with a GTK .so (if possible) would give strange results.

IMO, that is not a real problem, these are just two libraries.

Quote:

Also, with .so distributions comes the problem of devel packages. Traditionally installed .h files would not work well with out packaging scheme so I think we should skip this one and use the RPM/DEB for full U++ packages to get these files.

Maybe just put 'upp' folder to /usr/include and put all headers there in normal way - I mean, basically, just delete all .cpp files from uppsrc packages, put result into /usr/include/upp and add /usr/include/upp to INCLUDE path.

Quote:

Edit: also for MT version of lib.

Well, I think, MT should be just activated for .so.

Mirek

[Updated on: Wed, 03 September 2008 11:11]

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		U++ talk By: amrein on Mon, 01 September 2008 14:43
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: cbpporter on Mon, 01 September 2008 15:00
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: guido on Mon, 01 September 2008 23:32
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: amrein on Tue, 02 September 2008 11:38
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 14:22
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 10:06
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: amrein on Tue, 02 September 2008 12:45
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 13:53
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 14:17
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: cbpporter on Tue, 02 September 2008 14:19
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 14:29
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: captainc on Tue, 02 September 2008 16:22
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: mirek on Wed, 10 September 2008 19:26
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: mirek on Wed, 03 September 2008 09:49
		Re: U++ talk By: amrein on Tue, 02 September 2008 20:47
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 21:23
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 21:24
		Re: U++ talk By: amrein on Tue, 02 September 2008 22:20
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 23:20
		Re: U++ talk By: cbpporter on Tue, 02 September 2008 22:30
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 23:22
		Re: U++ talk By: amrein on Tue, 02 September 2008 23:37
		Re: U++ talk By: captainc on Wed, 03 September 2008 03:44
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Wed, 03 September 2008 09:58
		Re: U++ talk By: cbpporter on Wed, 03 September 2008 10:23
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Wed, 03 September 2008 11:10
		Re: U++ talk By: amrein on Wed, 03 September 2008 18:52
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Wed, 03 September 2008 22:55
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Wed, 03 September 2008 23:00
		Re: U++ talk By: cbpporter on Thu, 04 September 2008 04:52
		Re: U++ talk By: mr_ped on Thu, 04 September 2008 09:30
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Thu, 04 September 2008 12:45
		Re: U++ talk By: amrein on Thu, 04 September 2008 13:41
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Thu, 04 September 2008 21:55
		Re: U++ talk By: amrein on Thu, 04 September 2008 13:38
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Thu, 04 September 2008 21:54
		Re: U++ talk By: amrein on Thu, 04 September 2008 23:06
		Re: U++ talk By: amrein on Thu, 04 September 2008 23:28
		Re: U++ talk By: Mindtraveller on Sun, 07 September 2008 23:34
		Re: U++ talk By: Novo on Mon, 08 September 2008 05:01
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Mon, 08 September 2008 08:23
		Re: U++ talk By: Mindtraveller on Mon, 08 September 2008 09:22
		Re: U++ talk By: mr_ped on Mon, 08 September 2008 11:16

Previous Topic:	Assist - rescan code vs caching in files....
Next Topic:	Upp Idea -> MultiTouch support

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Sun Aug 24 20:21:26 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08539 seconds