U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » U++ talk

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: U++ talk [message #17953 is a reply to message #17950]

Thu, 04 September 2008 12:45

mirek is currently offline

mirek
Messages: 14267
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

mr_ped wrote on Thu, 04 September 2008 03:30

Quote:

plugin/z

I may be wrong, but doesn't the Core depend on the compression a bit with some files? For example .iml data, aren't they compressed?
(I'm asking, I have no idea what's the true)

It does. zlib has to be mandatory.

Quote:

I wonder also how we will combine those .so in final application? How should it work, like having core.so + guigtk.so + sql.so + application, with each ".so" having different functions and working together?

Yes. In fact, this is not uncommon - GTK = gobject + gdk + gtk.... (roughly equals to Core, Draw and CtrlLib+CtrlCore).

Sure, for those of us that understand and use U++ way of things, this sounds just like stone-age solution. But .so are for those that do not, I guess Smile

Smile

Quote:

I think there may be some funny stuff about making the memory allocator to work together across all the .dll files, but my knowledge is next to none, so if somebody has serious experience/knowledge, I would welcome some explanation how such application should work (the bigger picture).

Well, in the very worst case, we can just compile .so with NOMALLOC.

Anyway, I believe that if core.so is first, it will override new/delete for the rest.

AFAIK, the same applies in Win32. The trick (AFAIK!) is that linker searches .lib files for symbols in the order they are specified on commandline. new/delete are defined in standard c++ library, but that, as default, gets searched last.

Then, when linking, references are directed to the .so/.dll that contains the symbol...

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		U++ talk By: amrein on Mon, 01 September 2008 14:43
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: cbpporter on Mon, 01 September 2008 15:00
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: guido on Mon, 01 September 2008 23:32
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: amrein on Tue, 02 September 2008 11:38
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 14:22
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 10:06
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: amrein on Tue, 02 September 2008 12:45
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 13:53
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 14:17
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: cbpporter on Tue, 02 September 2008 14:19
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 14:29
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: captainc on Tue, 02 September 2008 16:22
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: mirek on Wed, 10 September 2008 19:26
		Re: Does the provided upp.spec works for you and on which distro? By: mirek on Wed, 03 September 2008 09:49
		Re: U++ talk By: amrein on Tue, 02 September 2008 20:47
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 21:23
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 21:24
		Re: U++ talk By: amrein on Tue, 02 September 2008 22:20
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 23:20
		Re: U++ talk By: cbpporter on Tue, 02 September 2008 22:30
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Tue, 02 September 2008 23:22
		Re: U++ talk By: amrein on Tue, 02 September 2008 23:37
		Re: U++ talk By: captainc on Wed, 03 September 2008 03:44
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Wed, 03 September 2008 09:58
		Re: U++ talk By: cbpporter on Wed, 03 September 2008 10:23
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Wed, 03 September 2008 11:10
		Re: U++ talk By: amrein on Wed, 03 September 2008 18:52
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Wed, 03 September 2008 22:55
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Wed, 03 September 2008 23:00
		Re: U++ talk By: cbpporter on Thu, 04 September 2008 04:52
		Re: U++ talk By: mr_ped on Thu, 04 September 2008 09:30
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Thu, 04 September 2008 12:45
		Re: U++ talk By: amrein on Thu, 04 September 2008 13:41
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Thu, 04 September 2008 21:55
		Re: U++ talk By: amrein on Thu, 04 September 2008 13:38
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Thu, 04 September 2008 21:54
		Re: U++ talk By: amrein on Thu, 04 September 2008 23:06
		Re: U++ talk By: amrein on Thu, 04 September 2008 23:28
		Re: U++ talk By: Mindtraveller on Sun, 07 September 2008 23:34
		Re: U++ talk By: Novo on Mon, 08 September 2008 05:01
		Re: U++ talk By: mirek on Mon, 08 September 2008 08:23
		Re: U++ talk By: Mindtraveller on Mon, 08 September 2008 09:22
		Re: U++ talk By: mr_ped on Mon, 08 September 2008 11:16

Previous Topic:	Assist - rescan code vs caching in files....
Next Topic:	Upp Idea -> MultiTouch support

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Sun Aug 24 20:20:30 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04920 seconds