Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » Documentation » Style & T++....
Re: Style & T++.... [message #18114 is a reply to message #18112] Wed, 10 September 2008 20:46 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
cbpporter is currently offline  cbpporter
Messages: 1428
Registered: September 2007
Ultimate Contributor
luzr wrote on Wed, 10 September 2008 21:38


Maybe we should not call sections "detail", I mean instead of "Method detail" I would use simple word "Method" or perhaps "Methods".


"Method" doesn't sound too English to me when followed by a list. Maybe "Methods".

Quote:


friend T Squared(Size_ a)
Returns a Size_ with it's dimension equal to the square of the dimension of a.

is IMHO quite confusion and/or incorrect description Smile


Yes, I'll fix that. Don't know what I was trying to say there Razz.

Quote:


Also, now thinking about it... Maybe it would be a good idea to "upgrade" "breakline" and "breakhead" styles to sentinels of one description. In that case, "breakhead" should be something like "section end" and "breakline" as "section begin".

This 'section' (better word needed) would be then used when description of single code item is required to delimit it.

Mirek



And how can I do that?
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: SVN Folder Creation Requests
Next Topic: The very first taste of T++ icons in the left bar..
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Aug 28 13:19:26 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.07419 seconds