Home » Developing U++ » Documentation » T++ working
Re: T++ working [message #18995 is a reply to message #18992] |
Mon, 03 November 2008 15:45   |
 |
mirek
Messages: 14267 Registered: November 2005
|
Ultimate Member |
|
|
chickenk wrote on Mon, 03 November 2008 08:14 | Hi,
just a small remark on the new system:
When at least one entry already exists and you want to add another entry documentation, you are not asked if this is a reference or implementation topic. The already existing entry type is used, and corresponding file opened. In the same manner, you can't add an implementation topic to an entry having a reference topic, and vice-versa.
I know the system is not finished, just wanted to make sure you know about that.
Lionel
|
Yes, I am well aware about the problem. The trouble is that I wanted to make it "quick" in the most common case, therefore the heurestic to adopt previous item topic, as long as scope and access mode is the same.
Any ideas for improved heurestics on whether it should go to topic directly or not?
(Of course, another possibility is simply to remove it 
Mirek
|
|
|
 |
|
T++ working
By: mirek on Fri, 31 October 2008 15:24
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mr_ped on Fri, 31 October 2008 16:57
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: chickenk on Fri, 31 October 2008 17:56
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Fri, 31 October 2008 18:49
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: captainc on Fri, 31 October 2008 23:53
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Sat, 01 November 2008 09:04
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: tojocky on Mon, 03 November 2008 08:19
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Mon, 03 November 2008 10:38
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: tojocky on Mon, 03 November 2008 13:37
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: chickenk on Mon, 03 November 2008 14:14
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Mon, 03 November 2008 15:45
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: chickenk on Mon, 03 November 2008 15:50
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Mon, 03 November 2008 20:44
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Thu, 06 November 2008 19:29
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: captainc on Fri, 07 November 2008 23:41
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Sat, 15 November 2008 14:48
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Sat, 08 November 2008 14:27
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mdelfede on Sun, 09 November 2008 10:48
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Sat, 15 November 2008 14:50
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Wed, 19 November 2008 22:47
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: captainc on Fri, 21 November 2008 03:10
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: tojocky on Fri, 21 November 2008 07:34
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Tue, 10 March 2009 22:40
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Fri, 13 March 2009 09:35
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Sat, 08 November 2008 14:24
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Sat, 01 November 2008 09:03
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Aug 27 11:08:11 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06431 seconds
|