U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ SQL » SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ???

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ??? [message #19341 is a reply to message #19339]

Thu, 27 November 2008 20:19

unodgs is currently offline

unodgs
Messages: 1367
Registered: November 2005
Location: Poland

Ultimate Contributor

sergeynikitin wrote on Thu, 27 November 2008 13:21

I have seen similar use in HomeBudget.
But there it was ::Update.

Incidentally, all want more examples on databases and SQL.

:: Is not necessary, it is even wrong as all upp functions belogns to Upp namespace.
I often had in my apps Update method in which I had SQL * ::Update. Without scope selector I would have names conflict. I still use :: instead of UPP:: because it's shorter.

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		SQL, SQL&, SQL:: ??? By: jeremyc on Sat, 01 September 2007 21:34
		Re: SQL, SQL&, SQL:: ??? By: mirek on Mon, 03 September 2007 00:14
		Re: SQL, SQL&, SQL:: ??? By: sergeynikitin on Thu, 27 November 2008 19:21
		Re: SQL, SQL&, SQL:: ??? By: unodgs on Thu, 27 November 2008 20:19
		Re: SQL, SQL&, SQL:: ??? By: unodgs on Thu, 27 November 2008 20:24

Previous Topic:	Syntactic sugar
Next Topic:	MSSQL new strange story :)

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Mon Jun 23 04:01:29 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04536 seconds