Home » U++ Library support » U++ SQL » SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ???
Re: SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ??? [message #19341 is a reply to message #19339] |
Thu, 27 November 2008 20:19   |
|
sergeynikitin wrote on Thu, 27 November 2008 13:21 | I have seen similar use in HomeBudget.
But there it was ::Update.
Incidentally, all want more examples on databases and SQL.
|
:: Is not necessary, it is even wrong as all upp functions belogns to Upp namespace.
I often had in my apps Update method in which I had SQL * ::Update. Without scope selector I would have names conflict. I still use :: instead of UPP:: because it's shorter.
|
|
|
 |
|
SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ???
By: jeremyc on Sat, 01 September 2007 21:34
|
 |
|
Re: SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ???
By: mirek on Mon, 03 September 2007 00:14
|
 |
|
Re: SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ???
|
 |
|
Re: SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ???
By: unodgs on Thu, 27 November 2008 20:19
|
 |
|
Re: SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ???
By: unodgs on Thu, 27 November 2008 20:24
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Jun 23 04:01:29 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04536 seconds
|