Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » U++ Library support » U++ SQL » SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ???
Re: SQL*, SQL&, SQL*:: ??? [message #19341 is a reply to message #19339] Thu, 27 November 2008 20:19 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
unodgs is currently offline  unodgs
Messages: 1367
Registered: November 2005
Location: Poland
Ultimate Contributor

sergeynikitin wrote on Thu, 27 November 2008 13:21

I have seen similar use in HomeBudget.
But there it was ::Update.

Incidentally, all want more examples on databases and SQL.

:: Is not necessary, it is even wrong as all upp functions belogns to Upp namespace.
I often had in my apps Update method in which I had SQL * ::Update. Without scope selector I would have names conflict. I still use :: instead of UPP:: because it's shorter.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Syntactic sugar
Next Topic: MSSQL new strange story :)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jun 24 00:26:12 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03710 seconds