U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Community » Coffee corner » Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading [message #22342 is a reply to message #22339]

Sun, 05 July 2009 22:10

mirek
Messages: 14267
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

Quote:

To be more precise, I takes more than single mutex per thread as there`s a queue and it really needs a semaphore.

I meant that if only operation you do is the one that is waiting for the result, it the same as locking instance mutex, calling method, unlocking the mutex.

Of course, not waiting for the result needs queue and semaphore.

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Tue, 14 October 2008 01:10
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mr_ped on Tue, 14 October 2008 08:27
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 15 October 2008 10:53
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Wed, 15 October 2008 11:59
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: zsolt on Wed, 15 October 2008 21:49
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 15 October 2008 22:53
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: zsolt on Thu, 16 October 2008 11:38
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Thu, 16 October 2008 13:48
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Thu, 16 October 2008 15:04
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Fri, 14 November 2008 10:09
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Fri, 14 November 2008 10:15
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Mon, 17 November 2008 16:41
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Tue, 18 November 2008 00:53
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Tue, 18 November 2008 20:05
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 19 November 2008 01:45
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Wed, 19 November 2008 10:39
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 19 November 2008 13:20
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Wed, 19 November 2008 19:38
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Thu, 20 November 2008 10:19
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Thu, 20 November 2008 10:42
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Tue, 27 January 2009 00:06
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Fri, 03 July 2009 10:23
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Fri, 03 July 2009 18:49
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Sun, 05 July 2009 21:43
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Sun, 05 July 2009 22:08
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Sat, 11 July 2009 16:06
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Sun, 12 July 2009 08:37
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Sun, 05 July 2009 22:10
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mr_ped on Tue, 18 November 2008 09:05

Previous Topic:	subversion client recommendation
Next Topic:	Google Chrome Operative System

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Sep 05 12:29:29 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.10065 seconds