U++ framework: U++ Library : Other (not classified elsewhere)

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Library : Other (not classified elsewhere) » Segfaults with One container?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Segfaults with One container? [message #23192 is a reply to message #23188]

Thu, 24 September 2009 12:25

phirox
Messages: 49
Registered: December 2007

Member

luzr wrote on Thu, 24 September 2009 11:06

BTW, I must have missed something, but why you dont just keep using the same Socket after fork?

Mirek

Because fork was just an example of one of the methods. I use exec(), which starts a whole new process. I catch the HUP signal which reloads the binary, basically giving the ability to update my program without losing any connections. It does this by saving every class variable that is necessary in a sessions file(xml) and then loading it back in the new binary. Which then resumes the socket connections.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Segfaults with One container? By: phirox on Tue, 22 September 2009 13:21
		Re: Segfaults with One container? By: mirek on Tue, 22 September 2009 17:52
		Re: Segfaults with One container? By: phirox on Wed, 23 September 2009 09:22
		Re: Segfaults with One container? By: mirek on Thu, 24 September 2009 09:43
		Re: Segfaults with One container? By: phirox on Thu, 24 September 2009 10:22
		Re: Segfaults with One container? By: mirek on Thu, 24 September 2009 11:06
		Re: Segfaults with One container? By: phirox on Thu, 24 September 2009 12:25
		Re: Segfaults with One container? By: mirek on Fri, 02 October 2009 10:01

Previous Topic:	Dockmenu Draw
Next Topic:	How to set a global (system) keyboard hook?

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Jun 10 01:22:46 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00711 seconds