Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » NEW: generic Toupel grouper
Re: NEW: generic Toupel grouper [message #28026 is a reply to message #28017] Fri, 13 August 2010 11:16 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
kohait00 is currently offline  kohait00
Messages: 939
Registered: July 2009
Location: Germany
Experienced Contributor
Quote:


But I am quite sceptical about those cast overloads too.


its just for easy handling, while opening doors to implicit casted assigns to wrong parameter (dont know if compiler would warn in such case, which operator() to take)

can be left out i think. if user uses it, he can type some 2 more letters and be on safe side. if he really needs this behaviour, polimophism is a good thing..
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Date limited to 2020 and 2015 does not work ?!?
Next Topic: Value question (memory consumption)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jun 02 10:18:24 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02119 seconds