U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers [message #28101 is a reply to message #27998]

Mon, 16 August 2010 09:06

kohait00 is currently offline

kohait00
Messages: 939
Registered: July 2009
Location: Germany

Experienced Contributor

it's actually the same behaviour as with T& Array::Attach(T* newt);
and merly a logical unification of interface, that anything that ends beeing an object, no matter newly added or as copy, should be instantly available, without the need to again access the container to get the same. here, it actually doesnt matter the container type, it's same situation for Vector and Array.

a practical use is this:

crating new container objects, based on some 'template' objects, and remodifying stuff that is actually different, on the new created object, pushing it somewhere to do something. this would use in case of Array:
void Array::Add(cibst T&),
then
T& Array::operator[](int i) with Array::GetCount()-1.
actually 3 invokations, that could be done in one.

it's maybe more of estetic use Smile

Smile

but could again add to Ultimate's short and reading friendly code

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Thu, 29 July 2010 22:17
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Tue, 03 August 2010 11:15
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: andrei_natanael on Tue, 03 August 2010 12:53
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Tue, 03 August 2010 16:06
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: andrei_natanael on Tue, 03 August 2010 22:44
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Wed, 04 August 2010 09:57
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Thu, 05 August 2010 08:35
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mrjt on Thu, 05 August 2010 09:55
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Thu, 05 August 2010 10:10
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Fri, 06 August 2010 11:27
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Fri, 06 August 2010 11:48
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Mon, 09 August 2010 08:50
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Fri, 13 August 2010 09:38
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Mon, 16 August 2010 09:06
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Mon, 30 August 2010 10:46
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Mon, 06 September 2010 10:53
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Mon, 06 September 2010 11:52
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Wed, 08 September 2010 09:00
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: rylek on Wed, 08 September 2010 10:24
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Wed, 08 September 2010 10:54
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Wed, 08 September 2010 11:30
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Fri, 17 September 2010 08:11
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Fri, 17 September 2010 09:15
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Thu, 21 October 2010 09:02
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Thu, 21 October 2010 11:10
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Thu, 21 October 2010 11:54
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Wed, 30 March 2011 10:54
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Sat, 16 April 2011 20:31
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Sun, 17 April 2011 14:46
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Sun, 17 April 2011 21:43
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Mon, 18 April 2011 09:00

Previous Topic:	InitCaps() proposal
Next Topic:	Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined.

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Mon Aug 25 02:29:48 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04365 seconds