U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined.

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined [message #31813 is a reply to message #31811]

Tue, 29 March 2011 14:59

kohait00 is currently offline

kohait00
Messages: 939
Registered: July 2009
Location: Germany

Experienced Contributor

thanks mirek, for the hint.

searched a bit in forum, seems i found sth related. please verify, this might / should go to documentation.

i've got some custom init code in a package, packed into a INITBLOCK, this all resides in a cpp file with appearently no referencing from other code, simple global/static init code.

did work with BLITZ, on both MSC and GCC in debug compile however in release, MSC didnt work, since i had to turn off BLITZ. with gcc it also only works with BLITZ enabled. so turning off BLITZ may possibly break INITBLOCK sections in one's app.

solution: i renamed the cpp file with the INITBLOCK code into .icpp file and woops, it works in MSC optimal without blitz. this assures the cpp file wont get kicked out by linker, since its code is not referenced by anything from another code section in app.

is this a general behaviour? can it be considered rule of thumb to rename the INITBLOCK containing cpp file to icpp file, if there is nothing in the file which will guarantee it's presence in linker later, like i.e. referenced code. if so, maybe this should be outlined somewhere in the docu

hints in: http://www.ultimatepp.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&goto=811 8&

[Updated on: Tue, 29 March 2011 15:28]

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined. By: Novo on Fri, 13 June 2008 21:33
		Re: Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined By: mirek on Sun, 15 June 2008 19:18
		Re: Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined By: Novo on Mon, 16 June 2008 06:05
		Re: Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined By: mirek on Mon, 16 June 2008 10:38
		Re: Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined By: mirek on Tue, 17 June 2008 09:33
		Re: Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined By: kohait00 on Tue, 29 March 2011 13:10
		Re: Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined By: mirek on Tue, 29 March 2011 14:12
		Re: Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined By: kohait00 on Tue, 29 March 2011 14:59
		Re: Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined By: mirek on Fri, 08 April 2011 23:31
		Re: Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined By: kohait00 on Sun, 10 April 2011 16:18
		Re: Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined By: cbpporter on Mon, 11 April 2011 11:14
		Re: Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined By: kohait00 on Mon, 11 April 2011 11:59
		Re: Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined By: mirek on Sat, 16 April 2011 19:59
		Re: Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined By: kohait00 on Mon, 18 April 2011 14:08

Previous Topic:	why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers
Next Topic:	ADDs: ValueMap

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Sat Jun 01 05:02:42 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01370 seconds