U++ framework: U++ Core » Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect_<double>)

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect_<double>) [message #31965 is a reply to message #31959]

Tue, 12 April 2011 09:44

kohait00
Messages: 939
Registered: July 2009
Location: Germany

Experienced Contributor

the question is which of the 2 API calls is the right one. since currently there are the 2.

this recently added approach is one similar to Size..

so it probably should be sth like

template <>
inline Rect_<double>::Rect_(const Nuller&) {
	SetNull();
}

it seems as if there is some duplicated code

EDIT:
the problem seems to be that Rect_<double> seems to need a different Null handling

EDIT: mirek could clear up why Rect_<double> needs extra treatment (i imagine because of Ctrl drawing handling)

but maybe the above approach could be generalized for both

[Updated on: Tue, 12 April 2011 11:29]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect_<double>) By: hans on Mon, 11 April 2011 22:25
		Re: Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect_<double>) By: kohait00 on Tue, 12 April 2011 09:44
		Re: Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect_<double>) By: mirek on Sat, 16 April 2011 20:42
		Re: Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect_<double>) By: kohait00 on Sun, 17 April 2011 14:39
		Re: Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect_<double>) By: kohait00 on Thu, 21 April 2011 08:28
		Re: Rect_<T>::SetNull not correct for Rectf (Rect_<double>) By: mirek on Mon, 25 April 2011 10:46

Previous Topic:	ADDs: ValueMap
Next Topic:	FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Apr 29 07:18:21 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01969 seconds