U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » Releasing U++ » deb packages don't update user sources properly

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly [message #32371 is a reply to message #26255]

Fri, 13 May 2011 12:43

dolik.rce
Messages: 1791
Registered: August 2008
Location: Czech Republic

Ultimate Contributor

The thing is that for the updater to detect changes, the local source tree must be kept clean. If you add another directories in there, and they are missing in the system-wide sources (in /usr/share/upp), the updater thinks they were removed from U++ and suggest to delete them (quite correctly). I have been lately working on some improvements in the detection which might solve this, at least partialy, but it is not in state to be commited safely just yet.

I think I will also add some sort of "ignore pattern", so you could mark files/directories to be ignored by the update mechanism. That is probably the best universal solution I can think of.

Honza

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		deb packages don't update user sources properly By: dolik.rce on Sun, 18 April 2010 19:40
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: mr_ped on Mon, 19 April 2010 12:06
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: nlneilson on Mon, 19 April 2010 12:35
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: mr_ped on Mon, 19 April 2010 16:37
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: dolik.rce on Mon, 19 April 2010 20:17
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: mr_ped on Tue, 20 April 2010 09:56
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: mr_ped on Tue, 20 April 2010 10:11
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: mr_ped on Tue, 20 April 2010 10:29
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: dolik.rce on Tue, 20 April 2010 18:10
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: mirek on Tue, 20 April 2010 18:50
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: dolik.rce on Tue, 20 April 2010 20:17
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: nlneilson on Thu, 22 April 2010 10:53
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: dolik.rce on Mon, 06 September 2010 23:43
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: dolik.rce on Thu, 20 January 2011 17:53
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: dolik.rce on Thu, 20 January 2011 17:56
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: jibe on Fri, 29 April 2011 11:03
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: dolik.rce on Fri, 29 April 2011 12:28
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: jibe on Fri, 29 April 2011 23:32
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: dolik.rce on Sat, 30 April 2011 04:55
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: jibe on Mon, 02 May 2011 10:40
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: jibe on Tue, 10 May 2011 09:47
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: dolik.rce on Tue, 10 May 2011 10:32
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: jibe on Thu, 12 May 2011 19:01
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: jibe on Fri, 13 May 2011 10:46
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: mr_ped on Fri, 13 May 2011 12:19
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: jibe on Sat, 14 May 2011 15:53
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: dolik.rce on Tue, 17 May 2011 19:28
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: dolik.rce on Fri, 13 May 2011 12:43
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: jibe on Mon, 23 May 2011 09:46
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: jibe on Thu, 26 May 2011 11:02
		Re: deb packages don't update user sources properly By: dolik.rce on Thu, 26 May 2011 19:45

Previous Topic:	Automatic nightly builds reastored - and reason(s) why it was failing (unodgs, please read :)
Next Topic:	[PROPOSAL] Changes to packaging scheme

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Aug 24 13:30:32 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05375 seconds