Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Community » Newbie corner » menu Tree
Re: menu Tree [message #32407 is a reply to message #32401] Mon, 16 May 2011 18:50 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Sender Ghost is currently offline  Sender Ghost
Messages: 301
Registered: November 2008
Senior Member
nlneilson wrote on Mon, 16 May 2011 10:31


That worked OK, is that just drawing an image of the box with/without the check mark you are pointing out?


Yes, but with internal implementation. External implementation could look like follows:
void App::FileBar(Bar& bar) {
	bar.Add("1L", THISBACK(OnCheck1L)).Image(tac1L ? CtrlImg::MenuCheck1() : CtrlImg::MenuCheck0());
}

nlneilson wrote on Mon, 16 May 2011 10:31


Is this what you had in your previous code or are you suggesting something different?


Something different: New dialog window with more detailed settings, without using MenuBar. It depends from your implementation. And using "MenuBar just to show current checked values and change them on one-click basis" on main window.
nlneilson wrote on Mon, 16 May 2011 10:31


Is there an easy way to set the text in the label bold?


By using QTF after \1 escape byte:
Label text;
text.SetLabel("\1[*1 Some informative text]");

or through Font settings:
Label text;
text.SetLabel("Some informative text").SetFont(text.GetFont().Bold());

[Updated on: Tue, 31 May 2011 20:33]

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [Printing] How to retrieve DPI, page size, etc
Next Topic: dll example errors when trying
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Aug 03 05:51:25 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05812 seconds