U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » Ptr improve

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: Ptr improve [message #32488 is a reply to message #32487]

Fri, 20 May 2011 14:43

kohait00 is currently offline

kohait00
Messages: 939
Registered: July 2009
Location: Germany

Experienced Contributor

i totally agree with you, thinking the shared or semi-GC way to the end, if it's implemented halfway (like this would be in this case) would bring one in serious trouble sooner or later. you end up breaking your head on how to prevent this damn thing from beeing destroyed. and u keep a Shared<T> instance around to do just that. and you could keep the whole instance just as well.

if at all used, it needs to be veeery consequent. so if one decides to handle an object in shared way, it needs to go completely like that. no mixes of API's (half is using Shared<T> and half T*)..
and it makes trouble when handling a polymorph type, here you want a Shared<Base>, there a Shared<Derived> and they'd need to have the same ref (which i adressed as well, but it's not posted yet)

nevertheless, as a helper, i will put it in my Gen package, as a matter of discussion, just in case one happens to need it some time again. is that ok?

[Updated on: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:45]

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		Ptr improve By: tojocky on Mon, 16 May 2011 14:07
		Re: Ptr improve By: mirek on Mon, 16 May 2011 15:05
		Re: Ptr improve By: tojocky on Mon, 16 May 2011 15:31
		Re: Ptr improve By: tojocky on Mon, 16 May 2011 16:06
		Re: Ptr improve By: mirek on Mon, 16 May 2011 23:13
		Re: Ptr improve By: kohait00 on Wed, 18 May 2011 11:40
		Re: Ptr improve By: tojocky on Wed, 18 May 2011 13:12
		Re: Ptr improve By: kohait00 on Thu, 19 May 2011 19:09
		Re: Ptr improve By: tojocky on Fri, 20 May 2011 08:32
		Re: Ptr improve By: kohait00 on Fri, 20 May 2011 11:04
		Re: Ptr improve By: cbpporter on Fri, 20 May 2011 11:51
		Re: Ptr improve By: kohait00 on Fri, 20 May 2011 13:03
		Re: Ptr improve By: mirek on Fri, 20 May 2011 13:19
		Re: Ptr improve By: kohait00 on Fri, 20 May 2011 14:43
		Re: Ptr improve By: kohait00 on Mon, 23 May 2011 13:34
		Re: Ptr improve By: cbpporter on Mon, 23 May 2011 13:52
		Re: Ptr improve By: kohait00 on Mon, 23 May 2011 15:23
		Re: Ptr improve By: dolik.rce on Mon, 23 May 2011 18:26
		Re: Ptr improve By: mirek on Mon, 23 May 2011 22:37
		Re: Ptr improve By: kohait00 on Mon, 23 May 2011 22:41
		Re: Ptr improve By: cbpporter on Tue, 24 May 2011 09:25
		Re: Ptr improve By: mirek on Tue, 24 May 2011 17:46
		Re: Ptr improve By: mr_ped on Tue, 24 May 2011 18:28
		Re: Ptr improve By: cbpporter on Tue, 24 May 2011 22:44
		Re: Ptr improve By: mirek on Sat, 28 May 2011 20:57
		Re: Ptr improve By: mr_ped on Wed, 25 May 2011 09:34
		Re: Ptr improve By: kohait00 on Wed, 25 May 2011 10:27
		Re: Ptr improve By: cbpporter on Wed, 25 May 2011 12:09
		Re: Ptr improve By: kohait00 on Wed, 25 May 2011 12:19
		Re: Ptr improve By: mirek on Sat, 28 May 2011 21:10

Previous Topic:	FIX: UPP::Scan returns int64 for INT_V
Next Topic:	GetCurrentDirectory() Doesn't contain the \ is this a bug?

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Fri Aug 22 06:16:47 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05995 seconds