|
|
|
Home » U++ TheIDE » U++ TheIDE: Other Features Wishlist and/or Bugs » Compound New <:PACKAGE:> name etc. [FEATURE REQUEST]
| Re: Compound New <:PACKAGE:> name etc. [FEATURE REQUEST] [message #3322 is a reply to message #3318] |
Fri, 19 May 2006 23:35   |
 |
fudadmin
Messages: 1321
Registered: November 2005
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
Ultimate Contributor
Administrator |
|
|
| gprentice wrote on Fri, 19 May 2006 12:23 |
I'm not sure I understand but it seems the purpose of the author/prefix/version items is
1. to make it easier to duplicate the package in future, however I don't understand why this makes it easier ??
2. Is your "duplicate package" command going to go through all the package source files and change #include <packagenameV1/xxx.h> to #include <packagenameV2/xxx.h> ??
|
1. Yes. And easier because of:
2a. First of all, try duplicate (your usual "copy directory" way) not HelloWorld but packages which have *.iml and *.lay. Tell your experience!
2b. Imagine you work with a team. Try to produce 2 different packages from 1 template... Or in 2 steps create 2 packages (a package which uses the other package which will be also versioned (with *.iml and *.lay). And test quickly 2*2 combinations. Experiences?
Or imagine creating a step-by-step tutorial-in-action... with different subtopics and combinations...
Edit2: Or having your testable and combinable (!) your code snippets database...
2c. And because the trick (remember, we were talking about)
#define IMAGEFILE PACKAGE_DIR/Vega.iml>
doesn't work well with GCC and BLITZ...
2d. And/or create a template which simply produces
#include ForlanoVega1/Vega.h etc...
customizable and shows them in the dialogue each time you enter a char!..
2e. And/or updates those names according to template params...
Edit:
2. Yes. and *.upp
[Updated on: Sat, 20 May 2006 00:05] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
Current Time: Fri Aug 29 12:10:21 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04350 seconds
|
|
|
Members
Pages
Help
Register
Login
Home
