fudadmin Messages: 1321 Registered: November 2005 Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
Ultimate Contributor Administrator
luzr wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 09:23
fudadmin wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 04:19
To provide information, yes -low quality jpg IS smaller. But the topic was that people want to demonstrate the beauty of their workspaces... That's why I said *.png...
1) .png would still be bigger for indistiguishable quality
2) I believe that the right way to demostrate beauty of the workspace is to upload it somewhere else (in whatever format) and post just link.
Mirek
Then the problem is with U++ icons!
Try to make 50.4kb *.png screenshot smaller *.jpg...