Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » why no virtual destructor for RegExp?
Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? [message #38800 is a reply to message #38795] Sat, 19 January 2013 12:03 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 14261
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
You are right. I think the author considers RegExp to be "sealed". Your contract is with public interface only.

Mirek
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Details when compiling in 64 bits
Next Topic: Wanted: OpenGL for gtk+ backend
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Jun 09 11:55:05 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05234 seconds