U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » why no virtual destructor for RegExp?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? [message #38889 is a reply to message #38888]

Fri, 25 January 2013 16:04

dolik.rce is currently offline

dolik.rce
Messages: 1791
Registered: August 2008
Location: Czech Republic

Ultimate Contributor

dolik.rce@gmail.com

Hi Navi

IMHO the pattern parameter should not be there, it is kind of confusing and against the whole idea that RegExp object represents the regexp pattern. If you want to have a chance to specify the replace pattern a separate global function might be better for this... It could use the RegExp object internaly, so it's not much work for you Smile

Smile

Quote:

	int  ReplaceGlobal(String& t, const String r, const String pattern=Null, bool backref=false); //DONE
	int  ReplaceGlobal(String& t, const String r, int offset, const String pattern=Null, bool backref=false); //DONE

Why not simply

	int  ReplaceGlobal(String& t, const String r, offset=0, bool backref=false);

... and similar for the vector and callback variant. It would make the interface simpler, without reducing its capabilities.

Note: The above is not any official requirement, just my ideas and opinions Wink

Wink

Honza

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: navi on Sat, 19 January 2013 06:22
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: mirek on Sat, 19 January 2013 12:03
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: navi on Sat, 19 January 2013 12:30
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: dolik.rce on Sat, 19 January 2013 13:19
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: navi on Sat, 19 January 2013 13:26
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: navi on Fri, 25 January 2013 14:58
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: navi on Fri, 25 January 2013 15:01
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: dolik.rce on Fri, 25 January 2013 16:04
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: dolik.rce on Fri, 25 January 2013 16:10
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: navi on Fri, 25 January 2013 17:37
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: dolik.rce on Fri, 25 January 2013 19:16
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: navi on Mon, 28 January 2013 07:11
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: mirek on Tue, 19 February 2013 17:15
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: navi on Wed, 20 February 2013 00:23

Previous Topic:	Details when compiling in 64 bits
Next Topic:	Wanted: OpenGL for gtk+ backend

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Tue Jun 10 14:15:33 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04657 seconds