U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » why no virtual destructor for RegExp?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? [message #39151 is a reply to message #38928]

Tue, 19 February 2013 17:15

mirek
Messages: 14261
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

After minor fixes in the interface (const added where possible, const String -> const String&), I have applied your changes to plugin/pcre.

Thanks for contribution.

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: navi on Sat, 19 January 2013 06:22
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: mirek on Sat, 19 January 2013 12:03
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: navi on Sat, 19 January 2013 12:30
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: dolik.rce on Sat, 19 January 2013 13:19
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: navi on Sat, 19 January 2013 13:26
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: navi on Fri, 25 January 2013 14:58
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: navi on Fri, 25 January 2013 15:01
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: dolik.rce on Fri, 25 January 2013 16:04
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: dolik.rce on Fri, 25 January 2013 16:10
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: navi on Fri, 25 January 2013 17:37
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: dolik.rce on Fri, 25 January 2013 19:16
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: navi on Mon, 28 January 2013 07:11
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: mirek on Tue, 19 February 2013 17:15
		Re: why no virtual destructor for RegExp? By: navi on Wed, 20 February 2013 00:23

Previous Topic:	Details when compiling in 64 bits
Next Topic:	Wanted: OpenGL for gtk+ backend

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Jun 10 10:58:41 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04084 seconds